A Sermon on the Explicit Idolatry of the Fourth Member Doctrine

I think it is possible in light of Rome's doctrine to call the "priest" a kind of fourth member, because he actually says he is "in the place of Christ" and he says of himself "I am Christ."  I think it is also possible to say that the Virgin Mary is their fourth member queen, because they refer to her as the "all-holy-One" and the Pope also has a divine title "Holy Father."  There is a discerning difference between a humility of Christian doctrine and an idolatry of Catholic doctrine.

In Jesus’ name!  Out of love of the truth of Christ here is my always refutation of a doctrine from hell: I praise the name of the Reformed Three Persons alone.  Amen.

1. The Fourth Member doctrine that says the Virgin Mary is the soul of the Spirit in the Godhead is a violation of Trinitarianism, for it contradicts the division between Creator and creature.  There is no god besides the Three in One.
2. The Fourth Member doctrine that says someone can take the place of Christ in the Godhead is a violation of Trinitarianism, for it contradicts the division between Creator and creature. 
3. The Virgin Mary cannot be the soul of the Holy Spirit, for it contradicts the eternal aseity of the Holy Ghost.
4. Another Christ is contrary to the sole Christ in the Godhead, for there is but one Christ and none else.
5. The Holy Spirit’s soul is His essence in His person, because He always existed.
6. The Son in the centrality of the Godhead is the only One in the Godhead, for He is alone is God that took upon flesh.
7. The Virgin Mary could never be the soul of the Holy Spirit, for again she is a creature touching a gulf of finiteness and infiniteness.
8. The creature cannot through grace or works or prayer or a spiritual wonder will themselves to deity, for only the Creator is forevermore self-existent.
9. The creature cannot avail themselves to deity through doing evil that good may come, for although sin taints everything it is not precedence for direct sin.
10. The creature should not be deceived in an advocation of godhood deification, for the creature will always be the creature and the Creator will always be the Creator.
11. The basic error of godhood is rooted in Satan’s rebellion of the exaltation of godhood, for he sought to rise above God.
12. The basic error of godhood is rooted in man’s fallen nature, for every sin is idolatry and it causes a kind of rising above God.
13. The basic error of the Virgin Mary as the soul of the Holy Spirit is contrary to the apple of God’s eye, for no deification rests with Beloved David.
14. The basic error of another Christ is an addition to the Triune Godhead, for there are three persons alone in the Godhead.
15. There is no union of creature and Creator that causes deity in the human person, for only a spiritual union exists between the Creator through His only-begotten God and the human elect sinner who has come to faith by the Spirit and the Word.
16. The Church is called the soul of the Holy Spirit by Denzinger in The Sources of Catholic Dogma, pg. 616; however, Jan Hus was unjustly accused of the teaching of the fourth member doctrine, but he said it was the farthest from his mind; that is, if the church is the soul of the Spirit it would strangely relate with the teaching of sedevacantism about the Virgin Mary as the soul of the Spirit; however, it strangely relates to pope Karol Józef Wojtyła, because he gave his life into the hands of the Virgin Mary; that is, only hope and rest is consistent with God not into the hands of a saint, but trust in a saint like Rome is also an hidden and open idolatry that exalts the Virgin Mary to godhood by a unprayer pray of an unveneration veneration to her.
17. The Church is called the soul of the Holy Spirit by Denzinger in The Sources of Catholic Dogma, pg. 616-617; that is, the Virgin Mary is a picture in Romanist theology of the Ark of the Covenant; however, she is also a picture of the Church in Romanism; that is, the statement betrays itself “Let it suffice to state this, that, as Christ is the Head of the Church, the Holy Spirit is her soul.”
18. The Virgin Mary in Romanist theology is a picture of the church, because they teach that it is through her that is the pathway to Christ; that is, if the church is the gateway to heaven Mary is that picture of the Church; however, this is contrary to the Reformed Bible, because when I saw the Reformed church illumined in the dark it was a picture of a people purchased by Christ in a dark world as His bride; that is, the bride is not a picture of Mary but a picture of sinner’s purchased by His blood, but how can Mary be that bride if she is a sinner?  Does it mean that that the “her” is the bride as mere sinners?  Does it mean that Mary alone is the soul of the Spirit?  It is suggested that it is mere sinners through works of satisfaction in the sacramental system that is the “her,” but if we look at the elevation of her we cannot help to be “mistake” it with Rome’s view of Mary.
19. Was it the intention of the Encyclical, “Mystici Corporis,” on June 29, 1943 to suggest the teaching that Mary is the soul of the Spirit?  I think it is consistent in their theology to suggest this implicit teaching, but to us Reformed believers it is contrary to sound theology to suggest the approved Roman understanding of the unadoration adoration of the Virgin Mary.
20. The teaching of Rome of her queenship would take you to her improper adoration, for she is held in greater esteem then Christ; however, when Christ is held in great esteem it is contrary to the hypostatic union of Christ in the Eucharist!
21. The teaching of Rome of her sinlessness is contrary to all have fallen short of the glory of God, for only the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are sinless and set apart.
22. The teaching of Rome in prayer to her is an unworthy act of devotion, for it is contrary to the law of Christian prayer in the Holy Bible.
23. The teaching of Rome in the co-redeemership of the Virgin Mary is contrary to Christ in the uniqueness of His sole Redeemership, for it alone is central to the Christian faith.
24. The teaching of Rome in the co-mediatorship of the Virgin Mary is contrary to Christ in the uniqueness of His sole mediatorship, for it alone is central to the Christian faith. 
25. The queenship of the Virgin May will take you to an unadoration adoration, for the essence of the nature of man is idolatry.
26. The sinlessness of the Virgin Mary will take you to an unadoration adoration, for the essence of the nature of man is pride.
27. The unprayer prayer of the Virgin Mary will take you to an unadoration adoration, for the essence of the nature of man is hypocrisy.
28. The co-redeemership of the Virgin Mary will take you to an unadoration adoration, for the essence of the nature of man is corrupt.
29. The co-mediatorship of the Virgin Mary will take you to an unadoration adoration, for the essence of the nature of man is wickedness.
30. In Romanist theology it would be consistent to call the Spirit of Christ the Spirit of Mary, for it is into her hands the pope commits his soul.
31. There is a pure virginity of the uniqueness of the Virgin Mary touching her clean soul in the direct sin of sexual impurity, but her sin was canceled out by the deity of the Son in her womb; however, we reckon that she was considered a venial sinner by the church fathers; that is, in light of the Bible we see venial and moral sin as moral sin but with different degrees of sin: all sin in its basic level is intentional but the mental state of unintentional sin is a Harmitologicalpomorphism, but this simply means what it seems to be but not what it is; that is, unintentional sin seems like unintentional sin but it is really intentional sin; therefore, the reason for the fifty cent theological term.
32. It is true that the Spirit precedes from the Father and the Son, but it also means that the Son is considered to be greatly worshiped and honored in the Roman Eucharist; however, it is a defied humanity in light of the heresy of Monophysitism, because the human nature cannot be on every Eucharistic table at once since it is the human nature; that is, Luther was merely right in the dimensional concept of the multiplication of His spirit; however, he was also mistaken like Rome in the presence of the Son’s human nature; that is, the human nature is seated at the Father’s right hand (as stated by Saint Augustine); however, it is far from the teaching of the Word that the Eucharist contains the Son’s human nature, because it is never multiplied touching His human nature; that is, only His divine nature is multiplied everywhere.  It means the preceding of the Spirit from the Father and the Son is contrary to the Nicene Creed, for it is a Monophysite Jesus!
33. A Monophysite Jesus could not atone for sin, because touching His human nature He atoned for sin; however, we must not confuse the two natures of His human and divine wills, because such would constitute a violation of the Council of Chalcedon.
34. A Monophysite Jesus could not remit sins, because He really did not live a human life but lived a defied human life that is not an establishment of the distinction between the two natures but a mixture.
35. How could the Spirit be given without measure upon a Monophysite Jesus?
36. How could Christ be glorified on the Cross as a Monophysite Jesus by the Father?
37. How could the Spirit make us adopted in His beloved through a Monophysite Jesus?
38. How can we be transformed if it is through a Monophysite Jesus?
39. Is the Spirit of Christ a visible person?  Indeed, He is.  I was walking in the park, but He hid in the bushes as I walked along with red and gold around Him.
40. Is the Spirit of Christ a human being?  No, indeed He isn’t.  It is an Pneumatologicalpomorphism, because like the Father He can take a bodily shape without constituting humanhood.
41. How can the Spirit honor the Roman’s churches “cutting off” of its members when they do not possess hypostatic Christ?
42. It is another Gospel to say there is a Fourth Member doctrine.
43. It is another Gospel to say that Mary is the soul of the Spirit.
44. The double Fourth Member doctrine is forgivable for every elect sinner, for I think the Lord knows about Balaamite practices and lets the angel of death pass by because of the Lamb’s blood.
45. No one can be forgiven through the double Fourth Member doctrine.
46. No sins can be remitted through the double Fourth Member doctrine.
47. No wrath can be appeased through the double Fourth Member doctrine.
48. No favor can be gained through the double Fourth Member doctrine.
49. The wrath of God is against sin, for that doctrine is sin.
50. It is not too surprising of a deception if we understand the fall of our first parents, for we would understand the nature of man.
51. No sin bears any excuse; however, repentance through Christ by the Spirit is the way His people are forgiven in that gift of His instrument, but we must pray for the Lord’s will in approved chastening unto gentle correction or approved wrath unto reprobation.
52. The Father cannot have a soul of a creature as His essence, for He alone is the true God with no additions.
53. The Son cannot have a soul of a creature as His essence, for He alone is the true God with no additions.
54. The Spirit cannot have a soul of a creature as His essence, for He alone is the true God with no additions.
55. The double Fourth Member doctrine does not prove the Trinity, because there is all-sufficient evidence of it throughout every holy page of the holy text of Scripture.
56. The double Fourth Member doctrine unlawfully disproves the Trinity, because it adds to it.
57. The concept of the Fourth Member doctrine was carried over to other doctrines of godhood, but it also unlawfully disproves what it sought to prove: the Triune Godhead.
58. There is no left hand of the Godhead, because there is only the Right Hand of Power in our only God and Redeemer Jesus Christ.
59. The Fourth Member does not prove Modalism, because there are three distinct persons in the teaching of the Bible.
60. The Fourth Member does not prove Unitarianism, because there are three distinct persons in the teaching of the Bible.
61. The Fourth Member does not prove Polytheism, because there are three distinct persons in the teaching of the Bible.
62. The Fourth Member does not prove Tritheism, because there is the Father, Son and Holy Spirit in a proper distinction without an improper precedence.
63. The visions of the Virgin Mary were not her, but someone under the Jesuit pope.
64. The Jesuit pope heaps sin upon sin, because he is a ministry of condemnation unto himself in direct harm of others.
65. The Fourth Member cannot be declared divine, because only the Triune God is divine.
66. The Fourth Member sought to prove the two natures of Christ, but it disproved it because no one can be declared a God.
67. The Fourth Member sought to prove the human nature of Christ, but it disproved it because of the fallen nature of Michael.
68. The Fourth Member sought to prove the Gospel of grace through the declaration of justification by faith alone, but it violated that no one can be declared God.  It means no one can be declared God, because the Gospel is about the divine work of Christ alone in precedence of His righteousness not godhood.
69. The double Fourth Member doctrine had the direct visible and hearable approval of the order of the Jesuits, for I heard it myself in my fallen innocence.
70. This doctrine could have killed us, but God was gracious to save us. It was like we were murdered, but still living.  It is a violation of dignity, because of the Gospel kindness and dignity of man.
71. No one should agree through psychological imitative trauma, because it constitutes an unlawful agreement of the precedence of further suffering.
72. All false doctrine is the pathway to misery, for it is the manifestation of the wrath of God in its adherence and continence.
73. No elect sinner in any act of idolatry is unforgiven; however, that elect sinner is chastened by God as a loving Heavenly Father.
74. No damned sinner is forgiven; that is, whatever injustice was done by the Jesuit pope remains there unforgivable sin with pending wrath.
75. All injustice will be brought to justice in this life if God so chooses, for He is gracious to the oppressed and victimized.
76. The injustice of injustices is seen in the harm of the gentle, for it was an unintended Trojan Horse by the victims but a clear plan by Satan and his pope.
77. The black pope is the Jesuit pope, for he is a pathway to hell.
78. All ungifted gifts of the Jesuit pope is like entering into Satan’s realm of the unknown occult, for it is also extremely harmful and very dangerous.
79. The danger of the occult is not to bring us to it, but to keep us away from it.
80. The danger of fornication is not to bring us to it, but to keep us away from it.
81. The danger of rape is not to bring us to it, but to keep us away from it.
82. The danger of murder is not to bring us to it, but to keep us away from it.
83. The outbreak of pestilence is a manifestation of the wrath of God, for it is because of the Jesuit pope from a spiritual perspective.
84. The Jesuit pope acknowledges that his spirituality touches all things, for it surely does!
85. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but grace alone disproves it, because it is all about Christ and His Work.
86. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but faith alone disproves it, because it is all about His unified work.
87. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but Christ alone disproves it, because it is all about His life and death alone.
88. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but Scripture alone disproves it, because there is no approved unextrabiblical extrabiblicalness.
89. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but God be the glory alone disproves it, because there is no glory except from the Three in One.
90. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but total depravity establishes the wrongdoing of it.
91. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but unconditional election establishes that He saved us not because of good or bad.
92. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but limited atonement established that He did not die for the many of the pope’s damned group but for the many, for it is the testimony of our Lord and Sovereign Jesus Christ.
93. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but irresistible grace establishes that the Fourth Member doctrine is not needed because of John 3 and Titus 3:5.
94. The Fourth Member doctrines are wrong, but preservation of the saints establishes the keeping power of Christ over against the false keeping power of the Fourth Member.
95. There will be a great malediction upon men for this doctrine, but the angel of death shall pass by those who are His own through the shed blood of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
96. There was no grace in the Fourth Member doctrines, because it is of Satan and not of Christ.
97. There is no hope for anyone who believes in the Fourth Member doctrine if left unchanged, for it is contrary to divine predestinarian grace and peace.
98. All things are ordained for our good, but this was the justification of the unbelief belief of the Jesuit pope; that is, he would entertain it to have the end justifies the means, but despise it at the same time.  It is a hidden malice, because it is his greatest fear to have his evil work out for someone’s good. It means all that he does is to bring everyone on the pathway to destruction, because he is the opposite of Christ, for he is that antichrist!
99. There is a game they play on turning things on its head, for it is their way of destroying the innocence of Gospel children.
100. There is no precedence of the advocation of an approved feminism, for it is also contrary to the Gospel in the deification of a woman.
101. There is no truth in anything of the Fourth Member doctrine, for there is no prince or queen but the Lordship and Kingship of Christ alone.
102. There is no way the elect can’t be spiritually saved, for all that are His own come and respond to faith in Christ.
103. There is no civil righteousness in those doctrines; yea, touching the divinity of woman, for it has nothing to do with the Bible.
104. The blameability is with the reprobates, because they have no forgiveness.  May wrath be kindled!  Amen.
105. There is no justification by the Jesuit pope in having a satanic nature and a Spirit nature, for it is contrary to the Bible; that is, to say a mixture of the occult and the Spirit together.
106. The blasphemy of the Spirit is in the people of the damned, for they also seek to break up households, friends, law enforcement, society, ordinary workers and especially the Reformed church.

May all glory, honor, veneration, worship, dominion and praise be to the Holy Trinity!  Amen.