The
Petillo Name from St. Peter the Apostle
Michael
(Named After Michael the Archangel)
Andrew
(Named After the Apostle Andrew)
Somewhere
Before July 1994: A Great Degree of
Civil Innocence: (A Hidden War Against
God of the Resurrection of non-Christian Nazism)
In
Memory of When They Took Jesus Christ down from the Cross
In
Memory of When the Monstrous Assault Ended Against Me
“A
TESTIMONY TO A UNKNOWN, UNLICENSED AND REAL REFORMED BAPTIST CHAPLAIN UNDER
TWENTY-YEARS OF INVESTIGATION OF A CRIMINAL NETWORK AS A FOREDETERMINED
INVESTIGATOR UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF KING JESUS, INCARNATE DEITY, TO RECORD THE
FACES OF JESUS, THE FACES OF VICTIMIZATION, TO BRING JUSTICE UPON THEIR HEADS
WITH THE SWORD OF THE GOOD BOOK (REGARDING THE ENEMIES OF GOD) WHO COME AGAINST
PEOPLE WITHOUT CAUSE. “MAY JUSTICE BE
DONE UPON IT.” (LORD OF THE RINGS, KING
AROGON).
The
Vengeance of the Unseen
A
Reformed Baptist Devotional Intellectuality
A Seminary Project in Defiance to Wisdom of Villainy Without
Atheistic Intellectual Nihilism or Theistic Prejudice to Naturalistic
Materialism
A
Scriptural Metaphysics According Existential Certainty in a Absolute Etymology
According to Tota & Sola Scriptura (All of Scripture Alone) Through a
Biblical Presuppositional Foundationalism of Cosmic Dust in the Cosmic Face of Cosmic
Tyrannical Demi-Gods of the Spiritual Unseen in Cosmic Violence (Without Cause)
Against the Immaterial Thought by
Ill-Precedence Against the Legitimacy of the Human Dignity of the Spiritual
Mind of Fallen Man But in Superlative & Worshipful-Honor of the Eternally
Immutable Perfect & Transcendent Triune Aseity Without Anachronism of the Immediate
Biblical Rationalism of Etymology of the Incomprehensible & Eternal
Inexhaustibility of the Imminent Incarnate Deity Who Will Judge the Living
& the Dead at the Day of Judgment According to a Reckoning of Everlasting
Perdition for the Damned and According to a Everlasting Mercy of the Glory of
Eternal Redemption Grounded on Solus Christus (Christ Alone) in Whomsoever He
Chooses According to Neither Good or Bad But By Him Who Sovereignly Calls By
His Absolute Freedom
Articuli
Fundamentales Fundamentum Fidei
(Fundamental
Articles According to Foundations of Faith)
By
Michael Andrew Petillo
In
Memory of Amor Iustitia (Love of Justice)
Copyright
© 2014
Nullified
All Times, All Courts
This
informal doctorate degree is conferred upon
Doctor
Divinity (DDiv.) in Systematic Theology
With a post-graduate
minor in
The
Sacred Science of the Philosophical History of Reformed Theology
An
Informal Long-Distance & Home Researched Degree
In the
Schooling of
The
Dr. Martin Luther Reformation School of Theology
(To
imitate the 95-Theses of Dr. Luther since a holy Triune God used it to change
the world in a biblical way (a good way) but what better subordinate standard
to imitate?)
At the
distinguished
St.
Peter’s Reformed Baptist Seminary
In
Deal Township, NJ, USA
By
M.A. Petillo,
Reformed
Baptist Apologist
M.A.
His., M.A. Rel., Cert. Apol., D.Th.
Orth. St.
“IN
DEFIENCE TO A MELTING POT OF CRIMINAL HERSEY WITH GREAT EMPHASIS TO THE ROMAN
CATHOLIC NILIHISM”
“1.5
Spaced to Make it Known That Our Minds Belong to the Individual Person and a
Good Triune God of Sola & Tota Scriptura (All of Scripture Alone) With 12
Font to Emphasis the Point of Length in Great Detail in Cosmic Hatred Against
Cosmic Evildoers”
“THIS
DISSERTATION IN LUTHER’S EXAMPLE IS NOT AGAINST DR. RC SPROUL’S STATEMENT OF
TRUTH ABOUT THE PRIMACY OF THE HEART AND MIND BUT A LOVE OF BIBLICAL
FOUNDATIONALISM.”
“A
non-deeming statement: I hereby declare that I know no limit in coffee-bean
energy in the spirit of Jonathan Edwards without proper English but run-on
sentences to make the devil run. I
hereby swear this in a generation where we all must run like Joseph of the Old
Testament. Have no regard for traffic
singles (sarcasm) but I am no Jonathan Edwards without comas in the official
informal sense.”
Non-tuition:
(It
is better to give than to receive)
Non-federal
accreditation association:
(Mentorship
with God’s Word alone is better than
learning
from the supremacy of secularism,
traumatic
fornication & opportune Satanism)
Non-Diploma
Mill:
(No-hand
out degrees but arduous, pain-taking,
in-depth
& strenuous studies)
Educational
Oath on Motive of Student/Professor:
(The
excellence of the honor of Jesus Christ Alone)
Standard
of Home-based Seminary:
(The
brilliance and excellence of transforming God’s Word alone
in
the sole pursuit of learning because learning is all about excelling
in
the love of Jesus Christ in all of the study of knowledge
and
the practice of wisdom).
DEDICATED
TO:
DR.
JAMES R. WHITE OF ALPHA AND OMEGA MINISTRIES & REFORMED BAPTIST ELDER AT
P.R.B.C. & DR. BOB MOREY OF FATH DEFENDERS & RETIRED PRESBYTERIAN ELDER
“BUT
SECRETLY BECAUSE OF ORANGES
AND COFEE THAT SECRETLY MAKES ME A HYPER-CALVINIST (AN OUT OF PLACE SILLINESS)”
Enrolled
in Study on Sunday, March
16, 2014 and awarded (on such-and-such a time)
“IN
THE SHATTERED IMAGE OF DR. LUTHER,
A
STYLE OF THE 95 THESES AT THE DOCTORATE LEVEL…”
IF
THE IMMATERIAL MIND IS REAL
The
Reality of the Constitution of the Inmost Being of Fallen Man
If
the immaterial nature of man is not real, how do you explain the First Adam was
created with consciousness in his human constitution in God’s general
revelation in the image of God or the likeness of God that is grounded on the
sole supremacy of divine revelation?
If
it is to be demonstrated that man does not have an immaterial mind, why is it
not demonstrated in the illogical fallacy of the absolute and objective
standard of divine Scripture according to its internal and external support
that constitutes its infallible reliability, trustworthiness and credibility in
God-breathed inerrancy on the self-awareness of human consciousness?
A
Presuppositional Apologetic on the Immaterial Nature of the Mind of Fallen Man
The
Scope of the Handiwork of the Triune Aseity on the Immediate, Emerging,
Dwelling & Surrounding Origin of Thought by the Handiwork of the Triune
Godhead of His Designed Accomplishment of His Eternal Foredetermined Plan in
the Glory of the Eternal Son Whether Unto Ultimate Justice or Ultimate Mercy
The
Existence, Spiritual, Nature, Character, Extent & Integrity of the Immaterial
Mind of Fallen Man
3,000
Disputations on the thesis question, “Is the human mind immaterial?” The question summarized, “Yes.”
Assensus
Regnum Christi Habitus Fidei
(Assent
According to the Kingdom
of Christ in the
Disposition of Faith)
SECTION
A: The Context of the Mind of the Father
of Lights (Month of June 2014)
Theologia
Veracitas Gratia Dei
(The
Theology of Truthfulness According to the Grace of God)
CHAPTER
1 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Does
the God of the “assumption” of Moses in Genesis 1:1 possess a mind?
CHAPTER
2 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
How
does a thought in the immaterial mind of God occur?
CHAPTER
3 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
a holy God open to all things perfectly?
CHAPTER
4 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
is the orthodox way to explain the lisping of a holy God without making Him a
liar?
CHAPTER
5 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
there a rebellious thought in the immaterial mind of God?
CHAPTER
6 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
there something a holy God thinks that is not perfect?
CHAPTER
7 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
How
did the Holy Father think of redemption in His design?
CHAPTER
8 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
does it mean for God the Father to do all according to His good pleasure?
CHAPTER
9 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Does
the Father perfectly will the Son?
CHAPTER
10 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
the Father a pantheist in all things or by His sheer thought sustain all
things?
SECTION
B: The Context of the Mind of Jesus
Christ, the Holy Spirit, the Intermediate State, the Last Judgment & Resurrection
of the Dead & Satan With His Fallen Angels (Month of June 2014)
Felicitas
Christus Intuitu Fidei
(The
Happiness of Christ in View of Faith)
CHAPTER
1 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
is the mind of Jesus Christ like as One Person with two natures?
CHAPTER
2 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
the human nature of Jesus Christ mixed with His divine nature?
CHAPTER
3 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
His divine nature confused with His human nature?
CHAPTER
4 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Did
God the Son become man in Jesus Christ regard flesh and bone in itself as
sinful?
CHAPTER
5 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Does
the Holy Spirit have a mind and how does thought occur in His mind?
CHAPTER
6 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Do
saints in heaven in the intermediate state have consciousness? If so, what is the etymology behind
affirmations of human consciousness in heaven?
CHAPTER
7 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Do
reprobates in hell in the intermediate state also have human
consciousness? If so, what is the
evidence for consciousness in hell?
CHAPTER 8 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
is a thought like in the mind of Satan and his fallen angels?
CHAPTER
9 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
How
will the mind of man be examined at the Last Day of Judgment by Jesus Christ?
CHAPTER
10 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
will the mind of man be like at the Last Resurrection for Reprobation or
Election?
SECTION
C: The Context of the Fallen &
Immaterial Mind of Man (Month of June 2014)
Paideia
Simplicitas Consilum Dei
(The
Teaching of Simplicity According to the Counsel of God)
CHAPTER
1 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
are the grounds for an immaterial mind?
CHAPTER
2 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
If
there is an immaterial mind, what constitutes human consciousness?
CHAPTER
3 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Does
the exclusivity of human consciousness in a human being constitute a real
person with human dignity?
CHAPTER
4 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
there moral precedence of human dignity if a real human being is unconscious?
CHAPTER
5 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Does
a human being constitute a real person at any level?
CHAPTER
6 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
If
someone is unconscious yet alive or someone born with disability, does that
constitute a living person whether unconscious or with disability?
CHAPTER
7 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
surrounds thought to make it move to the left or right?
CHAPTER
8 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
the human brain simply chemicals with no immaterial nature of the mind?
CHAPTER
9 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
if a false balance of chemicals does not constitute an excuse for sin but it
constitutes the fallen nature of man and accountability to a holy God?
CHAPTER
10 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
How
did sin enter into the mind of man to begin the fall of Adam if a holy God is
really a good God?
References
of Sources:
A.)
Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem, 2nd
Ed., Editor David M. Rosenthal
B.)
Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, Gleason
L. Archer
C.)
Genesis by John Calvin
D.)
Not a Chance by RC Sproul
E.)
Freedom of the Will by Jonathan Edwards
F.)
Scaling the Secular City: A Defense of Christianity by JP Moreland
G.)
The Bondage of the Will by Martin Luther
H.)
The Kingdom of the Cults by Walter Martin
I.) Body
& Soul by JP Moreland & Scott B. Rae
J.)Dictionary of Latin and Greek
Theological Terms by Richard A. Muller
K.)
Charts of Christian Theology & Doctrine
by H. Wayne House
L.)
Physics in Mind by Werner R. Loewenstein
M.)
Systematic Theology by Louis Berkhof
N.)
The Grand Design by Stephen Hawking
O.)
Reasoning from the Scriptures With the
Jehovah’s Witnesses by Ron Rhodes
P.)
The Philosophy of the Mind Edited by VC
Chappell
Q.)
The Theory of Everything by Stephen W.
Hawking
R.)
New Dictionary of Theology by Sinclair B.
Ferguson, David F. Wright & JI Packer
S.)
Westminster
Dictionary of Theological Terms by Donald K. McKim
SECTION
A: The Context of the Mind of the Father
of Lights (Month of June 2014)
Theologia
Veracitas Gratia Dei
(The
Theology of Truthfulness According to the Grace of God)
CHAPTER
1 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Does
the God of the “assumption” of Moses in Genesis 1:1 possess a mind?
1.
The
minds of the Triune God touching the Father, Son and Spirit are by nature
eternally harmonious.
2.
The
thrice mind of God is from everlasting to everlasting.
3.
The
Father’s will does not contradict the Son’s will but the Holy Spirit’s will
does not contradict the Father and the Son.
4.
The
Father’s design in His eternal mind is eternally approved by the Son and the
Holy Spirit approves of the Father and the Son.
5.
The
Father’s condescension in lisping to us is through the approbation of the Son.
6.
The
Father and Son’s condescension in lisping to us is not without the approbation
of the Holy Ghost.
7.
The
eternal Son’s is co-equally submission to the Father, the Father loves of the
eternal Son, and the Spirit of God who precedes from the Father and the Son.
8.
The mind
of God the Father always was, is and forever shall be.
9.
The
mind of God the Son (Incarnate Second Person) was, is and forever shall be.
10.
The
mind of God the Spirit (the person and deity of the Spirit) was, is and forever
shall be.
11.
If a
holy God is felicitas Dei, why
shouldn’t fallen mind reflect a holy God’s intent of particular
foredetermination in establishment of human responsibility of contrite
obedience but no attrition styled disobedience!
12.
If a
holy God is the righteous norm in and of Himself as the standard of standards
according to bontias Dei, why should
anyone fear injustice, cruelty or sin?
13.
Fallen
man fears a heretical anachronism of the absence or presence of the attributes
of the nature of God’s holy character.
14.
If a
holy God is summum bonum, how can
human religion say that fallen man in his eternally condemned state of
unregenerate condition with the eternal blackest of eternal darkest of eternal
coldness could ever contribute by bad or good?
15.The order of salvation would satisfy the
divine satisfaction of the Virgin Mary and the Saints (as taught by Romanism)
without regard for solus Christus (Christ alone).
16.
How
does a Triune God think? The Father in
His eternal economic distinction touching the First Person always thinks from
everlasting to everlasting of the approbation of self-existent righteous design
and particular determination without violation of His superlative innocence of
holiness.
17.
The Son
in His self-existent economic distinction touching the Second Person always
thinks as Incarnate Aseity of the approbation of the Father’s particular design
in foredetermination.
18.
It is
(where the eternal Son also wrote before all things what would happen in all
things that are and all things that will be without blameability of sin) but
God the Son became sinless man to fulfill the unified work of the life and
death of Himself as the sole basis for how someone is right with a holy God.
19.
The
Holy Spirit in His nature of aseity touching His eternal economic distinction
of the Third Person always thinks as the Dove & Hound of Heaven of the
approval of the Father’s determination through the Son’s imputed unified work
to bring this great of all great gifts by His spiritual application of
monergistic quickening (spiritual rebirth but non-reincarnation or non-deification).
20.
Everything
that has happened in human history in special creation from 4004 BC to the
Unknown Day of the Second Coming of Incarnate Deity (Jesus Christ) in the
Public and Bodily Rapture to all things in eternity is openly known in the mind
of the Triune Aseity (the One in Essence and Three in Person).
21.
The
self-existent mind of God is the most undiscovered territory in consideration
of all things but ever greater than the human brain, the depths of the sea and
the universe.
22.
If we
are made in the image and likeness of God by thinking with a mind, doesn’t it
follow that a holy God also a mind but now since God is God, He also has a
functioning eternal, self-existent and immutable mind.
23.
If a
holy God does not possess an eternal mind, how is He to think?
24.
Philosophical
atheists ask if a holy Triune God has a mind touching the mind of the Father,
the mind of the Son and the mind of the Spirit, but what do they suppose
constitutes a Triune Living Being? It is
a thrice mind of aseity but a Modalistic God or a Hindu Tritheist God but a
Monotheistic Trinitarianism.
25.
The
mind of a self-existent Triune God is eternally immutable.
26.
The
Being of God never had a beginning but was, is and forever shall be.
27.
If
something is that depends upon a Divine Maker in the positive outcome of
creatureliness, it surely must have a mind of the Power of Being (aseity or
eternal self-existence).
28.
If the
universe has the power of self-creation, how could it be before it is not or be
when it is not?
29.
If
there is an eternally self-existent Being, he could not exist by self-creation
because nothing can be and not be at the same time.
30.
If
someone says something is true and not true in the same relationship at the
same time, it is a heretical contradiction devoid of the biblical etymology of
logical understanding.
31.
Something
can be true and false in another sense in a different context with a different
emphasis in a different relationship.
32.
It is
alleged that the understanding of the sense of plain language in the etymology
of ordinary language is by a known secular philosopher that alleges the meaning
of sense emerged with atheistic meaning.
33.
It is
plainly in the literal interpretation of the sense of biblical etymology that
emerged with the Eternal Logos (God the Son) in 4004 BC at the abrupt creation
of all things by the Power of His Being by the Word of His Power.
34.
The
prejudice of Moses of the Old Testament around 1275 BC in writing what happened
in 4004 BC about the Triune Elohim is the creation by His Power and through His
Word.
35.
The
non-Gnostic foundationalism in presuppositional assumption of Moses of the
positive prejudice of the supernatural superintendence of the God-breathed
Torah (the Five Books of Moses).
36.
The
Triune Persons each possess an eternal, absolute and immutable mind of superlative
holiness, supernatural righteousness and miraculous aseity.
37.
Is
there a rebellious thought in the perfect and eternal and unchangeable mind of
the Father, Son and Spirit? By no means!
38.
Does a
holy superlative Triune God think? Most
definitely!
39.
The question
is if a holy God is eternal, immutable and perfectly sinless, how does He
think? As far as this limited statement
of the eternal inexhaustibility of the God-breathed Word, the God of the Bible
thinks as everything is eternally open to Him because nothing if greater than
Him in terms of eternal aseity.
40.
If a
holy God who thinks is immutable (unchangeable), how does He think? A holy Triune God thinks without changing in
His nature, but He condescends to us in John Calvin’s lisping.
41.
A holy
God in commanding repentance and threatening furious wrath but relenting or by
human expression repenting in the sense of forgoing His justice (not because He
sinned).
42.
Why
does it seem good to God to think of measurements of His grace and to act upon
it? A holy God is after the highest
mercy of His Hand and the highest justice of His Hand.
43.
A holy
God who thinks is after whatsoever is right in the absolute perfect sense of
everlasting aseity.
44.
A holy
God who thinks always is perfectly and sinlessly right in sinless aseity is
always concerned about His glory based on His superlative holiness.
45.
If a
Being is by nature aseity, what would authentically constitute that
self-existent eternal nature? Everything
the Bible clearly says God is: namely, holy, good, sinless, pure, eternally
aseity, immutable, compassionate, kind, merciful and just (to name a few
wonderful things of His attributes).
46.
How do
men repent? By the measurement of His
grace (not activism) or (not quietism) realized in His people so we understand
the incomprehensibility of God in the lisping persuasion of biblical thought of
chosen finite people.
47.
How did
a holy God create everything out of nothing?
A holy Triune God created out of nothing because He alone possesses the
Power of Being.
48.
Naturalistic
and materialistic evolutionists say they can create, but it is a farce and a
façade by nature due to the real meaning of creation by a Triune Aseity that
creates with pre-existing material.
49.
There
are those who are persuaded that the God of the Bible created out of
pre-existing material but the God of the Bible never created anything with the
help of a universe of aseity but rather by His sheer power of His Being through
the Power of His Word.
50.
The
worldly wisdom of fallen man has their universe of aseity that always was but
it is all running down, but does the Bible teach a God who is running
down? By no means!
51.The God of the Bible is not running down
like the atheistic philosophy of nihilism where everything is meaninglessness
with the second law of thermodynamics.
52.
The God
of the Bible has the Power of Being without being the logical presuppositional
fallacy of an impersonal determinism in an impersonal emergence of all things.
53.
There
is no way in biblical rationalism that an impersonal emergence of all things is
accounted for all the living things in the universe.
54.
If it
is not supposed in a biblical objectivism that the Triune Elohim created out of
nothing there is a view that is an almost Christian teaching.
55.
An almost
Christian teaching is not (right) or a presuppositional rationalism (the
etymology of Scripture) and it is without the circle centrality of the meaning
of the God-breathed Word.
56.
If
Evidentialism and Classical Apologetics is supposed without an understanding of
biblical foundationalism, it will led people to a wrong teaching like Deism (a
God that left the world go on natural mechanism).
57.
If we
do not speak of a biblical foundationalism (Jonathan Edward’s rational
presuppositionalism), there is no way to plumb the depths, heights, length,
breath and wideth of biblical etymology of the God-breathed Bible.
58.
Is it
possible to know how a holy God thinks?
Surely it is not exhaustively possible to fully plumb the
incomprehensibility of a holy God in its fullest sense of aseity (no man or
creature will in the most complete sense), but to continue to take upon
ourselves the meaning and application of the grace and knowledge of our Lord
and Savior Jesus Christ.
59.
After
final and future glorification of all the redeemed elect, we will know what He
knows (but what will that be like?), we will know that we perfectly glorified
through solus Christus (Christ alone) without the boasting of creatures for
their good or bad that they endure but for the sake of the Happy Christ.
60.
We will
still learn for all eternity the heavenly treasure-store of the Book above all
books: namely, the Good Book, the Bible to solely glorify the Triune Creator
& Redeemer in all-supreme, all-preeminent and all-central worship of
Aseity.
61.
A holy
God has made final glorification of His people without the transcendent nature
of aseity, deification or godhood by status or nature, but the proliferation
and domination of solus Christus (Christ alone).
62.
If a
holy God says sin (original sin, radical corruption, incomprehensible evil,
complete bankruptcy, total inability and total depravity in 3941 BC), is the
creature above the Creator, does it mean that sin is above a holy God? By no means!
63.
What
does sin mean when God-breathed perpetuity says that sin is the creature above
its Creator? The biblical etymology in
the clearness of a non-anachronism is the ordinary language in which we speak.
64.
Namely,
sin is cosmically rebellious and in the sense of being above its Creator is not
in the sense of aseity at all or any meaning thereof.
65.
The
meaning of sin rising above a holy Triune God is in the sense of unholy
defiance, cosmic rebellion and treacherous idolatry.
66.
Sin is
not aseity in anyway.
67.
The sin
of disobedience is rising above holy Triune God in the sense of actual
transgressions by a corrupt nature that does not constitute aseity in any sort
of reasonable etymology bound by truth according to God-breathed revelation.
68.
But
when the Bible speaks of rising above its holy Creator it is simply the
omission of whatsoever is right but the commission of whatsoever is eternal
sins of mega billions of eternal sins of mega billions of eternal sins of mega
billions.
69.
Sin is
not God, animals are not God, man is not God but the Triune God is God.
70.
A holy
Triune God created all things for the general revelation of the handiwork of His
superlative holiness of His beauty.
71.
The
special creation of all created things and supernatural mysteries is ultimately
subordinate to the Book of all books (the Bible).
72.
The
etymological superintendence of the Good Book (the Bible) determines the divine
reliability, supernatural credibility and miraculous certainty of its internal
and external evidence.
73.
Thrice
eternal mega billions of sins do not even come close to eternal aseity, because
aseity is what makes a eternal self-existent God, God.
74.
A
finite creature has a soul for eternity but not bound by eternal aseity.
75.
Fallen
sinners have misunderstood the immortality of the immaterial soul.
76.
The
immaterial soul is not eternally self-existent at all like the eternal Triune
aseity of a holy God.
77.The immortality of the immaterial soul is a
creaturely eternalness and immortality.
78.
Thoughts
can betray a fallen sinners but no thought in the absolute sense could betray
the holy Triune God of the Bible.
79.
If it
seems a thought in God’s eternal, immutable and holy mind betrays itself, it is
meanly not a real sin of betrayal at all, but a human expression to lisp to
God’s creation whether for ultimate mercy or ultimate justice.
80.
If
there is not a rebellious thought in God’s mind in terms of His eternal nature,
He must think eternally perfect in such a way that He is not dependent on
something in Himself as if it was rebellious.
81.
A holy
God does not exist with a eternal mind in the sense of being dependent on
something outside of Himself.
82.
A holy
God does eternally exist in the sense of not dependent on someone else in His
nature of aseity, because He holds the Power of Being in the eternal absolute
sense.
83.
A holy
God is in need of nothing in the sense of eternal perfection and sinless
self-existent immutability of aseity.
84.
A holy God
in Monotheistic Trinitarianism is eternally without being a god as a creature
by nature of statue.
85.
There
is no sense of the cessation of His self-existent nature of aseity.
86.
The
thrice mind of God in the self-existent Three Persons will never die because by
His eternal nature death has no absolute eternal power of Him.
87.
The
Father’s mind never thinks of something wrong, imperfect or sinful.
88.
The
Incarnate Son of God never thinks of miss-deeds of sin to do from Himself.
89.
The
Spirit of God (the Holy Ghost) never had a mind that thought of injustice.
90.
We must
be obedient people in the sense of a non-meritorious gift of His Hand in the
measurements of His grace to establish the Happy Father.
91.
It
comes down to an exalted humility without a humility that is not a humility to
establish the Happy Jesus.
92.
If we
lived the fruits of the Spirit of God we would establish the Happy Spirit.
93.
Is the
mind of the Triune God unhappy? In the
absolute sense of His Being in eternal aseity, He is always perfectly and
sinlessly happy.
94.
but
alas! at the practical and experiential level of Christian practice He is
injured in the sense of the non-contradictory mystery of human expression of
His displeasure of sin in the mystery of concurrence in high Compatiblism.
95.
The
Triune God who thinks is always thinking upon His creatures, and we pray He has
His way with us due to His absolute superlative non-unjust holiness according
to His happy pleasure unto everlasting mercy with self-interest of being spared
to glorify the Father through His Son by His Spirit for all eternity.
96.
The
Father eternally possesses a self-existent mind.
97.
The Son
has a self-existent mind from everlasting to everlasting.
98.
The
Spirit is Someone who has a eternal mind.
99.
No one
in all creation is from everlasting to everlasting in the minds of the Three
Persons.
100.
If
Moses did not assume Triune Elohim, it would be sinful.
CHAPTER
2 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
How
does a thought in the immaterial mind of God occur?
1.
The
Father did not design the eternal place of hell for cruelty but perfect and
eternal justice.
2.
The
Triune God thought of the everlasting place of hell because of violations of
His perfect moral standard.
3.
A holy
God is without or devoid of the historical yet heretical doctrine of
annihilationism.
4.
The
rational biblicalism of a rejection of annihilationism is due to an
establishment by the doctrine that is opposed to human dignity.
5.
and likewise the harmonization of the Triune
fellowship of Incarnate Deity and the Holy Spirit.
6.
The
Father cherishes the Son!
7.
The Son
cherishes the Father!
8.
The
Father and the Son cherish the Spirit!
9.
The Spirit cherishes the Father and the Son!
10.
The
Father is perfectly self-aware of Himself without the idolatry of the cult of
self-esteem, and likewise the everlasting Son of God and the Holy Ghost.
11.
The
Father never thinks an unjust thought toward any, the Son never thinks an
unjust thought toward any and the Spirit never thinks an unjust thought toward
any.
12.
The
Father is not of His creation as a creature, the Son touching His divine nature
of aseity is not of His creation as a creature but fully man in His Incarnation
(as God Incarnate) and the Spirit is not of His creation as a creature though
He takes the form of a dove and yet He fully possesses a personality and deity
in Himself as the Third (non-Tritheistic Polytheism).
13.
The
Father does not have sin in His mind, the Son does not have sin in His mind and
the Spirit does not have sin in His mind.
14.
The
Father is not a sinner, the Son is not a sinner and the Spirit is not a sinner.
15.The Father through the Son by the Spirit
always thinks what is righteously holy in the absolute sense of aseity (without
being a creature).
16.
If the
Father, Son and the Holy Spirit did not pursue His righteous glory unto justice
or mercy He would not be by nature the Triune God.
17.
The Father
always chooses the right way to glorify Him.
18.
The Son
always chooses the right way to glorify Him.
19.
The
Spirit always chooses the right way to glorify Him.
20.
Every
sin before the Father for His elect alone is propitiated (the Son pacified the
Father’s wrath by His Cross alone).
21.
Every
sin before the Father for His chosen is expiated (the Son removed it as far as
from the east is from the west by His Cross alone).
22.
The divine
approbation of the Father (the alone Holy Father) is the Son.
23.
The
supernatural approbation of the unified imputed work is through the eternal Son
of Man (Jesus Christ).
24.
The
spiritual application of the Hound of Heaven (the Holy Spirit) is quickened
regeneration (incorporeal rebirth) to everyone of the chosen elect and none
else.
25.
There
is nothing the Father or Son or Spirit has not known that cannot be unknown by
Him.
26.
If
someone tried to erase God the Father’s mind with sin it would be more profound
for Him to know a double sinfulness of iniquity.
27.
If
someone tried to erase God the Son’s and Spirit’s mind with sin it would also
be more apparent to Him.
28.
How are
the minds of the Triune God erased in the sense of superlative holiness
touching divine satisfaction of divine justice?
Yea but only through the Cross!
29.
The
Spirit knows everyone whom He will quicken to monergistic health (spiritual
rebirth).
30.
The
Father knows what happens in all eternity.
31.
The Son
knows what happens in the eternal place of perdition.
32.
The
Spirit knows what happens in the everlasting place of heavenly peace.
33.
The
immaterial minds of the Triune God are furious with sin.
34.
The
immaterial minds of the Triune God love through the sole supremacy of the Cross
of the divine, eternal and immutable Lamb of God.
35.
The
immaterial minds of the Triune God know the beginning from the end.
36.
Atheists
ask “does God think?” The Scriptural
objectivism of a logical rationale is that a holy Triune God thinks upon His
meticulous special creation because how is anything done through the
irrationality of an impersonal force, universe or fatalism?
37.
Atheists
ask “does God have a mind?” The biblical
rationalism of a logical mind of the consequence of cosmology indicates a
Triune Elohim that created all things by the sheer Power of His Being by the
Power of His Word.
38.
Everything
in the immaterial minds of the Triune Godhead is immediately grounded,
miraculously governed and intricately planned through supernatural superlative
holiness.
39.
All
things are open to the Triune Persons supernaturally eternally, divinely
immutablely and superlatively perfectly.
40.
Everything
in the minds of the Triune Godhead is open.
41.
There
is one essence of the three minds of the exact three persons.
42.
The
mind of the Father is thinking in immediatecy of His creation.
43.
The
mind of the Son is thinking about His creatures.
44.
The
mind of the Spirit is thinking about His creation.
45.
The
Father thinks of the love of the good of justice for everlasting reprobates.
46.
The
Father thinks of the love of the good of mercy for eternal Christians.
47.
The Son
thinks of the love of the good of His Cross.
48.
The Son
thinks upon the love of the good of wrath for never-converted reprobate for all
everlasting perdition.
49.
The
Spirit thinks of the love of the greatest gift of the Son to His chosen.
50.
The
Spirit thinks of the love of the furious wrath in trophies of justice.
51.The Father thinks good of the Son.
52.
The Son
thinks good of the Father.
53.
The
Father and the Son thinks good of the Spirit.
54.
The
Spirit thinks good of the Father and the Son.
55.
The
Father, Son and Holy Spirit are of everlasting perfect reasoning of eternal
aseity.
56.
The mind
of the Father is immaterial of aseity.
57.
The
mind of the Son is immaterial of aseity.
58.
The
mind of the Spirit is immaterial of aseity.
59.
The
thoughts of the Triune God are lovely and of good report.
60.
The
thoughts of the Triune God are righteous and pure.
61.
The
thoughts of the Father are eternal, perfect and unchanging.
62.
The
thoughts of the Son are everlasting, sinless and immutable.
63.
The
thoughts of the Spirit are self-existent, immaculate and unassailable.
64.
Everything
of the Triune God is about the glory of whatsoever is right in final wrath or
final grace.
65.
The
Holy Father (God the Father) thinks in what seems best to Him.
66.
Jesus
Christ (Incarnate God the Son) thinks in what pleasing Him.
67.
The
Holy Ghost (the Third Person) thinks in free goodness unto holiness.
68.
All
Three Persons think in their eternal minds with superlative holiness.
69.
The
bottom of the thought of God in a sort of a human expression but without
contradiction but the mystery of the mind of aseity is ground in absolute
perfect immutable holiness.
70.
The surrounding
of the thought of God is eternally perfect and is because He is but He thinks
transcendently upon His immediate creation.
71.
The
Deist God is far removed from creation even in thought but the God of the Bible
always thinks upon His creation and He is immediately involved in all.
72.
The top
of the thought of God is His eternally immaculate and perfect immutability by
nature.
73.
The
thought of God’s consciousness comes into His divine realization of aseity that
is not sinful rebellion like the fallen race.
74.
It is
beyond us finite people in the absolute sense.
75.
Every
eternal thought of God is in a non-maverick way of thought in God’s mind.
76.
Unless
we saw God’s mind and He could condescend in His lisping of His thoughts by
saying something He thinks.
77.A holy God thinks because His eternal mind
is so boundless, vast and unmeasured.
78.
This is
the eternal self-existent mind of Father, the aseity of the mind of Son and the
everlasting to everlasting mind of Spirit.
79.
There
is One Unity by Nature but Three Minds of Aseity as Persons.
80.
If God
is not in need of anything, how do we explain His thoughts upon creation? Everything from a holy God at the First
Cause that has happened or will happened from 4004 BC to the Unknown end of the
World (without a holy God’s blameability of sin at the second cause) is what a
holy God designed in the sense of particular foredetermination in a complete
overthrow of Deism.
81.
If a
holy God thought to create and spoke everything into being by Him who holds the
Power of Being, does it follow that a holy God is dependent on what He has made
in some illogical sinful sense? If a
holy God by nature is superlatively holy, He will not lie to break the Word of
the Book above every book (the Bible).
82.
A holy
God has done whatsoever He pleased devoid of His commission or omission of evil
in some kind of blame to Triune Innocence.
83.
A holy
God is without a Zoroastrian dualism but grounded on His superlative
sovereignty that does whatsoever He pleases but without any darkness of sin or
shadow of turning (a mutability of actions of sin).
84.
A
Islamic understanding of Allah is foreign to the Bible because of the Father of
Lights design of the eternal Son’s Cross.
85.
The
Father’s thoughts on the Cross of His eternal Son is a propitiation (pacify the
Father’s wrath) and expiation (removed as far as the east is from the west).
86.
Islam
rejects the thoughts of the design and determination of the Father through the
eternal Son’s work of living a sinless life to earn spiritual salvation.
87.
Islam
hates the thoughts of the plan of the Father through the eternal Son of God’s
work in His Cross of spiritual redemption where His own sacrifice to have the
absolute and eternal power to lay down His life and to take it up again.
88.
Modern
Judaism hates the Christian Bible’s understanding of the Father’s thoughts on
the Son’s unified imputation of His work.
89.
Modern
Judaism hates the thoughts of Jesus Christ in His unified divine righteousness
of Incarnate God the Son.
90.
The
Father never sinfully wronged the Son, and likewise the Son to the Spirit, and
the Spirit to the Father and the Son.
91.
The
Father imputed sin to the Son at the Cross in the Father’s highest design of
eternal goodness.
92.
The
Father’s thought of His design was that sin was applied to the Son but that was
the perfectly blameless teaching of the Cross of the Lamb of God.
93.
The
Father thinks of perfect fellowship with His eternal Son.
94.
The
eternal Son of Man thinks of immaculate friendship with His Heavenly Father.
95.
The Son
is co-equally submissive to the Father touching the eternal Son’s nature of
aseity but inferior to the Father touching His humanity.
96.
It
pleased the Father that the matchless Son of Truth (Incarnate Truth) become
sinless man.
97.
It
pleased the eternal Son of Wisdom (Incarnate Wisdom) to obey the Father’s
design in co-equal.
98.
The
eternal Son thought to live a perfect life to earn salvation.
99.
The
eternal Christ thought to die a perfect death to forgive and cleanse sin.
100.
The
Father, Son and Spirit (the three persons) never thought a thought that
betrayed them because He is by nature perfect touching eternal self-existence
in such a way that even His eternal existence without dependence upon something
else but perfectly self-sufficient, self-reliant and self-secure in a
transcendent eternity of absolute reality that defies any sort of sin, blemish
or darkness in Him (the one nature of God).
CHAPTER
3 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is a
holy God open to all things perfectly?
1.
How
does a holy God understand heresy?
Simply that it does not reflect the immediate author’s intended meaning
and application of the written Word.
2.
If a
holy God understands heresy, does that also means He sins? Never!
3.
As the
sovereign Potter, a holy Triune God removes His hand from a sinner to either
humble them in a civil sense to understand truth in a refined way, or He
removes His hand from them for everlasting perdition.
4.
The a
holy God that removes His Hand from a elect person unto humility and atonement
through the Cross, or from a reprobate person unto destruction and absorption
of justice now and in hell, is not blamable for the sin but how…?
5.
A holy
God has the rights over the clay to make it in whatsoever He pleases (but not
make it to sin) because those who sin make it themselves but as a tyranny…?
6.
Far,
far from it! By the motive of whatsoever
is right unto ultimate justice or ultimate mercy….
7.
Where
does the blame reside? A holy God
remains separate from all sin and blame of sin, but the sin is the fault of the
creation as He prepares them as He wishes…
8.
It is
either unto the grace of perfected glory unto eternal mercy in honor of Jesus
in His unified imputation of His life and death alone as the sole grounds for
how someone is right with a holy God as He determines or the wrath of perfected
glory unto eternal indignation in honor of Jesus in His crafting of those
trophies and vessels of destruction as He determines according to whatsoever He
pleases but all of this on what basis….?
9.
A
superlative holy God by nature of aseity, carries with Him attributes of
transcendent perfection where whatsoever seems good to Him, is what He
does….but how does a holy God understand what seems good to Him?
10.
A holy
Triune God understands what seems good to Him (at this feeble level of my words
but not untrue) that it is on the basis of His superlative holiness, perfect
righteousness and a supernatural divine purity of everything perfectly good.
11.
If this
is true (but not if in the sense of a legitimacy of true doubt but very much
the case in reality of no illusions of absurd philosophy or evolutionary
psychology), but on the basis of a holy God that is superlative innocent of all
wrong in a such a way that everything happens by the Law of Whatsoever Is Right
upon the basis of the positive consequences, implications and causes that
define His superlative glory…
12.
If a
holy Triune God is not concerned with His righteous glory (not as an egoist but
God help us that we think such things) but on the basis that if He is not
consumed about His glory, He would not be consumed about what is right…
13.
If He
is not consumed about His righteous holiness by nature of aseity, He would not
be concerned about His glory at all…
14.
What
then is the foundationalism of His aseity?
His holy character of superlative holiness of superlative holiness of
superlative holiness….
15.If man is holy at all, it is certainly not
activism (self-righteousness) or quietism (an out of place view of God) but a
holy Triune God of everlasting to everlasting.
16.
Does a
holy God endorse heresy? That’s like
asking if a holy God endorses sin. That
is, it is impossible and He never endorsed heresy.
17.
A holy God
understands heresy for the good of His people to refine divine truth, but also
for the good of final justice for His enemies.
18.
The
Bible is an eternal Book but it did not fall from heaven like the Muslim.
19.
If the
Bible is eternal how do we understand what sense eternal means? It is in the sense of God’s straight
word. There was a time when the word of
people was honorable, but those times seem to have past. Yet the God of the Good Book (the 66 Books)
has a word of eternal truth.
20.
It is
impossible to separate have the divine truth of the nature of the Triune God
and the divine truth of the nature of tota and sola Scriptura (all of Scripture
alone)…
21.
The
written Word of Truth is not above a holy God like Lucifer’s rising in idolatry
in the sense of rebellion but not the nature or statue of aseity of the nature
of the Triune God but in what way…?
22.
The
written Scripture (God-breathed perfected perseveration from all eternity) is
above a holy God not of worship of the Holy Bible at all (a heretical
anachronism) but in what way….?
23.
The
Good God-breathed Bible is above a holy God in the sense of the fallen sinner
knows God’s divine words cannot be undone where a holy God cannot go against
Himself….
24.
An
example is, if a holy God cannot violate His good word in the Bible, it is in
that sense of an eternal indestructible Book, that does not require worship in
this fine technical language, but requires contrite obedience in an exalted
humility of living out the God-breathed Writ of truly worshiping the Triune
Aseity.
25.
There
was never a time a holy God went against His superlative holiness according to
the written Word of True-Wisdom, Perfect-Words and Loving-Knowledge.
26.
In what
way was the Good Book (the Bible) eternal?
The is above a holy God in that He cannot go against it because He keeps
His written Word on superlative goodwill of absolute immaculate holiness of
divine superlative truth.
27.
What
was open to a holy God in the immediate sense before all things in terms of
something that is the written Voice of God and the written Word of God without
idolatry? The Bible!
28.
What is
impossible for a holy God by His superlative holy nature? Sin!
29.
If a
holy God does not sin how did sin come into the world? Theologians use technical language and here
is what we say: Sin came into the fallen
world by the causing permission of a holy God without sin by sole precedence of
purpose for it as final justice or final mercy in honor of Jesus but not
approval of sin, but sin came into the world by a holy God that created all
things very good and holy, and yet the author or sin is not a holy God by
nature but the author of sin is the fallen second cause: namely, fallen man,
fallen Lucifer and fallen angels.
30.
The
thrice fallen world is man, the devil and demons, but how does a holy God
understand sin if He did not commit sin?
31.
Do you
have to understand something to commit sin?
By no means!
32.
So how
does a holy God understand sin (that which He did not commit)? Simply, He understands sin because by nature
He is perfectly omniscient (all-knowing).
33.
How is
a holy God all-knowing? It is by His
nature of aseity.
34.
If a
holy God understands what sin is in His mind and yet He does not sin to
understand what sin is, what is a holy God guilty of? A holy God is guilty of nothing except a kind
of Murphy’s Law (a way to no good deed goes unpunished by a wicked world and
dark universe) by a human expression (anthropomorphism).
35.
If sin
is impossible for a holy God, does that mean a holy God is not God that is God
and not a false God but a true, true God in the fullest sense of plain
truth? Yes.
36.
If all
things are open to a holy God by nature because is beyond all things (not in
terms of the anachronism of sin (out of place) but in terms of His holy
character of transcendence of aseity and yet imminent Hypostatic Christ (two
natures of human and divine) as the Incarnate Second Person, how is His awesome
openness to all things a denial of the alive dead past, the fleeting present
and the open future but completed future?
Upon what basis is this said….?
37.
Upon
the basis of this: does a holy God know
the end from the beginning? Yes!
38.
How
does a holy God know the end from the beginning? A holy God knows the end from the beginning
because He designed all as the Triune Architect.
39.
How did
a holy God design it all as the Triune Architect? A holy Triune God wrote the pages of history
in eternity past by particular foredetermination of all things.
40.
The
Father knows the thoughts of all living things based on aseity in perfection.
41.
The Son
knows the human consciousness behind all mysteries.
42.
The
Spirit searches the deep things of God, what does it mean? He works with the God-breathed Scriptures
(the Good Book) to search man and spiritually help a sin-sick soul by
illumination of a renewed mind (sound words of truth).
43.
If
someone dies in 1932 AD is it possible for them to live before they lived after
their death or after they died to live when they never did from coming back
from heaven as Romanism contains? NO!
44.
Who
were the only two to come back from heaven?
It was Elijah (the prophets) and Moses (the law) in the support of the
supreme centrality of the only perfect Prophet and Lawgiver, Incarnate Deity,
Jesus Christ. How and why…?
45.
It was
possible because they are not disembodied spirits but possess a glorified body
like Jesus Christ, but the question is do they possess a body like Jesus before
His resurrection that was already sanctified but not yet glorified with an
immediate sense?
46.
I
suppose they possess a body of glorified but also yet to be glorified at the
Day of Joy for the Last Resurrection of the body where it is like Jesus’ body
after His bodily resurrection.
47.
What
about from the place of hell as occultist may contain? NO!
The occultist may try to access hell to consult with evil but if a
spirit emerges it is likely a cloak of light as a demon or a reprobate
transcending time through a wicked means of the good elect angel’s spiritual
system.
48.
Some
say St. Samuel came into the occultic sorcery when reprobate Saul consulted an
occultic medium but some say it was a masquerading demon but shall we
say…?
49.
There
is no way for an occultic sorcery to take someone from heaven in their
intermediate state into an occultic vision.
How do we know this?
50.
Heaven
is the most secure place in all existence but it seems to me that though a
difficult question that St. Samuel may have been aware of the occultism before
his death because rebellion is the art of occultism.
51.Now Samuel came in spite of the occultism
not an approbation of it. No disembodied
spirit can be summoned from heaven by occultists but in the sense of Jesus
Christ every soul that is His is in a sense redemptively contained in Him by
the Father’s oath without deification of redemption.
52.
It is
possible for Jesus Christ to summon whomsoever He pleases but suppose in His alleged
post-ascension ministry He makes an encounter, does heaven know something on
earth?
53.
As far
as I am aware, there is are mediate clouds of glory still accessible but not
the immediateness of heaven.
54.
The
immediateness of heaven cannot be accessed from heaven but the Triune Godhead
knows everything that goes on there and even Satan cannot access it.
55.
The
mediate clouds of glory are on the outer parts of heaven where Satan approaches
God but also where demons request before Jesus to destroy people.
56.
Jesus
is battles with them but always conquers in victory.
57.
There
is a sort of a special cloud of glory where it is possible to work there but
darkness will find a way to creep into the clouds of gospel charity (but secure
by the protection of God) but mind you this is not the immediateness of heaven
where it is a sort of an unknown secrecy of glorified godliness.
58.
The
unknown secrecy of glorified saints of the awesome symbolism of the wonderful
place of heaven is in terms of a supernatural spectacular place beyond words
that cannot be touched by this world or Satan himself or an worthless onslaught
attack of heaven by spiritually dumb and yet malevolent demons.
59.
Is
there a basis of an unknown secrecy in heaven?
Yes, according to Matthew 16:20, there are holy secrets (still unknown
in the glory of heaven and the place of hell) but the known evil of occultism
is really a hidden wickedness of a methodology of unknown occultism.
60.
There
is no doubt demons are involved in Saul’s submission to occultism but he
remains fully responsible before a holy God like the medium.
61.
I think
it was Samuel because Jesus refers to the netherworld where heaven and hell
exist, but un-inseparable way where heaven can view hell and hell can view a
glimpse of heaven but no one can cross to and fro.
62.
The
saints rejoice for the eternal place of heaven in victory over hell but hell
stands in horror of the holy God of heaven and hatred of God and His people.
63.
What
about this: if someone dies in 1901 BC is it possible for them to live before
they died after their death without occultism or after they died to live later
on in the future where they do not physically exist without violating heaven or
hell biblically? YES! How….?
64.
It is
possible if there is an opening in the past before they died or accessing the
past before they died to open a way to the future but only in spiritual terms
and not physical terms but in what sense?
65.
The
spiritual can impact the physical and yet what sense? The spiritual can go back and forth in time
in the spiritual transportation device.
66.
In the
spiritual transportation device the body remains physically in a positional
state where the spirit can observe, speak and do things but it has the capacity
to be used for reckless evil or for the greatest good.
67.
Satan
and demons can tap into these things but in terms of human consciousness the
only way he would know is by an evildoer viewing the spiritual wonder (only
meant for elect angel affairs) where they tell counterintelligence secrets
about the human consciousness to destroy a human unawares or cause massive
trauma by occultic power.
68.
If
devils have access to the spiritual wonder, they seek to use it in a
methodology of counterintelligence and deeds of darkness with the impossibility
of delaying God’s love in their destruction on no basis whatsoever but to
establish the face of Jesus and to share in the sufferings of Job (a shattered
image in a complete way of great degree and yet a sting of suffering that seems
unthinkable).
69.
I was
really, actually and authentically born again by monergistic terms (man is
spiritual dead in passive terms by God changes the heart to a new heart in the
order of salvation) by the Spirit and the Word in the later summer of 2004.
70.
If a
time traveling Christian in spiritual terms went back to my childhood so I
would be born again, it is impossible to be done because the Spirit does not
work of a quickening of rebirth twice.
71.
If a
holy God allows an opening in the past it is very easily done through Him,
because everything is open to Him but completed unless contingent.
72.
If something
is contingent it means an unconverted person makes a profession of faith without
a possession of faith in our example of 2004 AD, but by a opening in a
spiritual mystery (God lisping in a spiritual wonder) makes it possible to go back
to time travel evangelism in spiritual terms to make the
contingent of sin in our example of 2004 AD now blocked, countered and honor of
the Gospel restored by the fool’s optimism of monergism (regeneration rebirth)
somewhere in the past like 1999 AD.
73.
In the
way I use the word contingent, it does not mean it is against particular
foredetermination but rather it is a profession of sin that can be undone
through the right handling of the God-breathed Scriptures in the possession of
Christ in an time transcended evangelism that carries the approbation of the
inward effectual call.
74.
If
there is a mystery of time in a non-evolutionary understanding devoid of an
atheistic determinism of a materialism of time, how do they explain a spiritual
mystery in the sense of the mediate past
is open like the immediate present
and the distant mediate immediate future is open like immediate present.
75.
If the
holy Triune God is open to all things, is it possible that somehow the past is
still open from the wisdom of God in the present? but alas! in what sense?
76.
If a
holy Triune God is open to the future present like the future past, what is His
condescension to this theological reality of time?
77.The condescension of a holy Triune God’s
reality of time is a lisping mystery that reveals the openings of the past, the
openings of the present and the openings of the future but to a holy God
everything is a shattered now (a shattered now because of sin after 3941 BC in
the historic Fall of Adam).
78.
A holy
Triune God knows all things perfectly by the holy character of superlative
holiness of a thrice holy Triune Creator & Redeemer.
79.
If a
holy Triune God is open to the future, He immaculately knows all things
perfectly.
80.
If a
holy Triune God is open to the present, He is sinlessly aware of everything.
81.
If a
holy Triune God is open to the past, He is perfectly knowledgeable of it behind
any mystery of condescension.
82.
The
omniscience of the Triune God is not made-up but it is a biblical rationalism
of the Good Book (the 66 Books).
83.
The
Father, Son and Holy Spirit is perfectly aware (omniscient) of the past,
present and future (it is open to Him alone) in its creaturely boundless ways.
84.
The
Father, Son and Holy Spirit is perfectly aware of eternity in all that goes on
in the place of heaven.
85.
The
Triune God is perfectly aware of eternity in all that goes on in the place of
hell.
86.
The
Father is open to all things as if all things have happened but they have not
happened.
87.
The Son
is like the Father and the Spirit as they are open to all things.
88.
The
Triune God is open to all things without sin but He is eternally sinless.
89.
Is it
right to say “how did God become holy?”
The question is a heretical question because a holy God did not become
holy but it is His nature.
90.
Another
question “How did the nature of God became the nature of God?” Again it is an out of place question or not acquainted
with biblical rationalism of Scripture.
91.
“Is
aseity an assumption about the nature of God?”
It is about the context of the nature of assumption but in what context
of the meaning of nature of Being….?
92.
Atheists
assume the eternal self-existent of the universe but it is running down by the
obvious fact of order to disorder but it does not neglect God’s divine
intervention of a non-deist approach of the spiritual reality of all things
(not a non-pantheistic teaching).
93.
If a
holy God is truly aseity, what assumption could it be but a righteous
assumption, but if a righteous assumption, what else would be the position of
the God-breathed written Word?
94.
It is
possible that some may say there is aseity, but attributed to a false God but
what is the context of such a statement…?
95.
If such
a confounded thing exists it is sort of like the heretical teaching of deism
but if such a case of the Scriptural perpetuity (or clearness) of Scripture
obviously demonstrates the non-deistic evolutionary paganism of a comfort that
is not a comfort….
96.
If everything exists (and things do exist),
the positive consequence of all things is the positive affirmation of a Triune
Elohim of Aseity.
97.
The
Triune Power of Being has the nature of aseity because of the perpetuity of
everything that is…and everything that is comes from the Triune Being that
thought of all things (by the very statement a lisping to His frail special
creation)…
98.
If a
holy God lisps to His creatures does He violate His perfect holiness? By no means but substantiates it!
99.
How
does a holy Triune God who thinks substantiate holiness? By exercising His holy attributes!
100.
How do
we know the Father thinks? Because of
the fulfillment of the eternal Son’s plan, but how do we know the Spirit
thinks? because alas! He comes with the gift of the Son to freely bestow THIS
GREATEST EVERYTHING (Jesus Christ) to the vilest offender at His chosen timing
according to His whatsoever good pleasure.
CHAPTER
4 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
is the orthodox way to explain the lisping of a holy God without making Him a
liar?
1.
A holy
Triune God is immutably impeccable and superlatively holy by nature.
2.
In the
lisping of God He never lies.
3.
A holy
God in superlative holiness speaks His matchless Word.
4.
It is
against God’s holy superlative nature to lie because His nature is perfectly
holy.
5.
What
makes the nature of God the nature of God?
The nature of God is His being.
6.
How did
the nature of God become the nature of God?
A holy God did not come into existence if existence means the plain
sense of Being.
7.
If we
ask this we fall into heresy to say God came into Being.
8.
If we
say a Triune God became a being by nature we sin.
9.
The God
of the Bible did not became a Being into existence because He is from
everlasting to everlasting.
10.
A holy
Triune God always was is and forever shall be.
11.
If a
holy God thought lisping would be a lie, He would never do it.
12.
Lisping
is not a lie because a sinless Triune God condescends.
13.
The
true Christian has a indwelling of God the Father after spiritual quickening….
14.
The
authentic Christian has the indwelling presence of Incarnate Deity in them
after monergistic regeneration (rebirth)…
15.The genuine Christian has the indwelling of
the Holy Ghost (the Holy Spirit) after being born again (the greatest of
greatest of God’s good gift)…
16.
The
Trinitarian indwelling of the elect converted sinner does not bring
deification, godhood and a god by nature or status….
17.
The
Triune God alone has the definition of God…
18.
The
Holy Trinity is without illegitimate ahistorical meanings or heretical biblical
meanings and applications…
19.
The
chosen holy men did not make a holy Triune God a lair in His written Good Book.
20.
A holy
God is holy, perfect, immutable and eternal.
21.
A holy
God condescends in His lisping but it cannot be sin.
22.
A holy
God the Spirit in His lisping is accommodating (not lying) to His elect sheep
by the indwelling Trinitarian possession.
23.
If a
holy God the Spirit is accommodating, He does it because of His knowable
incomprehensibility.
24.
Knowable
incomprehensibility is a limited understanding of a holy Triune God.
25.
Knowable
incomprehensibility does not mean we are defied but it means we are fallen,
frail and feeble human creatures where a holy Triune God is so beyond us that
He must speak in terms that we can understand.
26.
The
glorified elect will know what He knows at that time of final glorification.
27.
The
glorified creatures will be something they were not in their whole persons.
28.
The
glorified saints will continue to learn through eternity.
29.
The
glorified proliferation and domination of solus Christus (Christ alone) is
final glorification but….
30.
Saints
glorified will not become Jesus in a literal sense but…
31.
The
Spirit of God (the Holy Ghost) will become a glorified sinner like a perfect little
Jesus but not the Fourth Member in any sense and there is no one that is such a
thing…
32.
The
glorified elect are only glorified not the sense of godhood.
33.
The
glorified elect are only glorified through solus Christus (Christ alone).
34.
The
Spirit of God’s lisping to His people.
35.
The
Holy Ghost’s baby talk in His God-breathed Good Book is not sinfully childish.
36.
The
meaning of the Good Book (the Bible) is about a God-honoring cause.
37.
The
application of the Bible (the Authentic Scriptures) is about Spirit-honoring
love.
38.
The
divine truth of God is about the Bible and the Bible about divine truth of God.
39.
The
transformation of the written Word of God (the Good Bible) is about the precise
meaning of the written Scriptures.
40.
The
meaning of the Scriptures is without childish meaning or applications.
41.
The
meaning and application are Christ-honoring biblical rationalism.
42.
The
author’s intended meaning of the Old and New Testaments (the God-breathed
Scriptures) is the divine truth of God transformed in authentic preaching.
43.
The
Holy Ghost authored the meaning and application of the Ten Commandments.
44.
The
Holy Spirit authored the meaning and mega billions of applications of the New
Testament commandments.
45.
Slavery
to Jesus Christ in God’s open Good Book is giving up all our rights to serve
Him by the perpetuity of the Bible to live out the Christian faith in godly
living.
46.
A holy
God the Spirit created out of nothing “In the beginning God created…”
47.
A holy
God the Spirit applied His authorship to special revelation.
48.
The Ten
Commandments, the Old Testament, the New Testament and the Incarnation are
God’s special divine revelation.
49.
The
Holy Spirit overshadowed the Virgin Mother of Jesus Christ in her virginal
conception (without a human father).
50.
The
Bible (the Good Written Word) was set in eternity past before the Triune
Godhead.
51.Its not that it came from heaven on a
parachute but rather that a holy Triune God revealed it to chosen holy men to
write the infallible superintended Scriptures.
52.
The
Father designed and determined and planned the supernatural self-authenticity
of the Bible with all its components in a kind of lisping.
53.
The Son
accomplished the work of Incarnate Truth.
54.
The
Spirit accomplished the application of the Word of Truth.
55.
The
Spirit is accredited with the particularly inspiration (God-breathed) ways of
the Good Book (the Bible).
56.
The
Spirit of God (the Holy Ghost) had a work of divine superintendence of the
Bible.
57.
The
Father’s design through the friendship of the Son by the Spirit miraculously
superintended the Bible (the Good Word of God) through holy chosen men.
58.
The
God-infallible Scripture is the Holy Spirit’s writing on the wall but put into
divine revelation in the Good Book of the holy Triune God.
59.
All of
the Bible is God-breathed (inspired) and it is God’s baby talk to us.
60.
The
God-breathed written Scriptures are not literally from heaven (the Quran).
61.
The
God-inerrant Bible is a heavenly Book but it was written by holy men of old.
62.
The
God-efficacious Good Book is eternally inexhaustible.
63.
Some
atheists like Dr. Alan Swcherin, a Bertrand Russell Society fellow, asserts
that God’s lisping is a lie but if a holy God is God it cannot be a lie in His
condescension to us in His reasoning of lisping to His frail human
creatures.
64.
The
lisping of God in His divine truth is like a father speaking to a small child.
65.
The
lisping of God in His divine truth is like a mother speaking to a little child.
66.
A holy
God is incomprehensible (not in absurd confound thinking) but He lisps to His
frail creation to have them reason together.
67.
If a
holy God spoke without lisping (devoid of sin) it would not follow because
creatures by status or nature are not god but a holy Triune God is God.
68.
The
Triune God who lisps does this without the motive of sin or any sort of sin.
69.
A holy
Triune God lisps to us so we may understand what seems best to Him.
70.
The
thrice mind of the Three Persons is beyond us but though we are confounded it
does not mean what goes on in God’s mind is confounded but that it is beyond us
in such a way of unbelievable creatureliness into the realm of the One essence
of God revealed in Three Persons.
71.
The
Lord lisped to God’s people in 66 Books of the Bible (the Good Book).
72.
The
Triune Aseity of God in His written Word (the Bible) is eternally
inexhaustible.
73.
The
eternal inexhaustibility will go on forever in the learning of God’s Bible.
74.
A holy
God will continue to lisp to His glorified human creatures forever.
75.
There
will be different degrees or levels of learning in the glory of heaven.
76.
I
suppose as time advance in the place of hell it gets worse and worse.
77.The furious indignation of His outpouring
wrath in the eternal place of perdition is against rebellious sinners for
everlasting punishment without injustice.
78.
Damned
never-converted sinners in the place of hell learn more and more of God’s true
justice.
79.
The
learning of God brings grief to the never-converted reprobates because of the
worldly wisdom.
80.
Reprobates
also have an ungodly sorrow of misery.
81.
Reprobates
have a great flame of attrition that is in hell.
82.
The
Apostle Peter says to grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior
Jesus Christ as a New Testament Commandment.
83.
True
Christians will have the transformed Scripture in preaching.
84.
True
Christians will have the sanctified blessing by God’s Spirit and Word to excel
in the love of knowledge.
85.
Real
sanctified knowledge of Scripture is not an ungodly sorrow.
86.
Authentic
holy wisdom of the God-breathed Word will led to godly sorrow.
87.
Godly
sorrow means real repentance unto real life.
88.
Ungodly
sorrow means a false repentance of attrition.
89.
False
knowledge will lead to a false comfort that is not a comfort.
90.
False
wisdom will lead to a false peace that is not a peace.
91.
False
love of information will lead to a selfish end.
92.
Holiness
can only happen by God’s Spirit and Word.
93.
What if
a heretic writes like Origen in thousands of thousands of works? He will have a great sorrow unless the Lord
changes him.
94.
The
unregenerate people could have a head-knowledge of real truth.
95.
A
head-knowledge of real truth cannot be practiced but as an almost Christian.
96.
An almost
Christian does not have the Spirit.
97.
The
Spirit of God (the Holy Ghost or Holy Spirit) is the One who has the particular
work to sanctify the truth in every true Christian.
98.
The
worldly wisdom of this world is folly and vanity and idolatry.
99.
God’s
lisping is countered by heretics who transform God’s Word wrongly.
100.
What is
the meaning of the etymology of the right understanding of God’s lisping to us
in His God-breathed Letter of Love (the Good Book)? It is simply the author’s intended meaning
superintended by the Spirit of God (the Holy Ghost).
CHAPTER
5 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
there a rebellious thought in the immaterial mind of God?
1.
The
Triune Godhead is the one in essence of eternal awesomeness but revealed in
three persons of the greatest awesomeness of supreme eternal preeminence.
2.
The
Father is the crux of greatness, the Son is the crux of greatness and the
Spirit is the crux of greatness.
3.
The
Father is immutable, the Son is immutable and the Spirit is immutable.
4.
The
Father is holy, the Son is holy, and the Spirit is holy.
5.
The
eternal Father has an immaterial mind of divine humility.
6.
The
everlasting Son has an immaterial mind of supernatural humility.
7.
The
Holy Ghost of aseity has an immaterial mind of miraculous humility.
8.
If the
eternal Triune Creator and Redeemer of all things is founded on eternal aseity,
how could anyone teach that He is an evil tyrant (my intent is not to insult
the presence of the Three Persons by the very notion but to refute an error)?
9.
The
Economic Trinity has the Father as the First Person because of design.
10.
The
Economic Trinity has the Son as the Second Person because of His unified work
of the gift of real divine righteousness of merit of matchless Spirit-based
imputation.
11.
The
Economic Trinity has the Spirit as the Third Person because the application.
12.
The
ultimate plan of the Father is the Father’s design, determination and plan.
13.
The
ultimate work of the eternal Son is His matchless life and matchless death.
14.
The
ultimate application of the Holy Spirit of aseity is His person and deity.
15.The Spirit is the First to apply the work
of the Son in the Father’s design (The Spirit, the Father and the Son).
16.
The
Father is the Second to send the Spirit through the Son (The Spirit, the Father
and the Son).
17.
The Son
is the Third regarding the Spirit that applies by the Father’s determination
(The Spirit, the Father and the Son).
18.
The Son
is First concerning redemption of the Father’s design (The Son, Spirit and
Father)
19.
The
Spirit is Second concerning application of the Son’s work in the Father’s
design (The Son, Spirit and Father).
20.
The
Father is Third concerning His design of the Son’s work by the Spirit’s
application (The Son, Spirit and Father).
21.
The
Father is the First in His thoughts of cosmic design.
22.
The Son
is the Second in His thoughts of cosmic work.
23.
The
Spirit is the Third in His thoughts of cosmic application.
24.
The
Economic Trinity is the logical Trinitarianism of Economic Aseity.
25.
The
distinctions of the Three Persons are the Economic Triune Godhead.
26.
The
economic distinction is the First Person, the Second Person and the Third
Person.
27.
The
Father thinks of the Son in sinless honor.
28.
The
co-equal yet submissive Son thinks of the Father in sinless worship.
29.
The Spirit
is co-equal yet submissive.
30.
The Spirit
thinks of the Father and the Son in sinless worshipful honor.
31.
The
Father loves the Son.
32.
The Son
loves the Father.
33.
The
Father and the Son loves the Spirit.
34.
The
Spirit loves the Father and the Son.
35.
The
Father is, the Son is and the Holy Spirit is.
36.
The
Triune mind of God did not come into existence.
37.
The
Three Persons always was is and forever shall be grounded on aseity.
38.
The
Father has an individual immaterial mind.
39.
The Son
has an individual immaterial mind.
40.
The
Spirit has an individual immaterial mind.
41.
The
Father did not get His mind from the Son.
42.
The Son
did not get His mind from the Father.
43.
The
Father and the Son did not get their minds from the Spirit.
44.
The
Spirit did not get His mind from the Father and the Son.
45.
The
mind of the Father works with perfect immutability.
46.
The
mind of the Son works with sinless immutability.
47.
The
mind of the Spirit works with sinless immutability.
48.
The
mind of the Father thinks perfectly from everlasting to everlasting.
49.
The
mind of the Son thinks perfectly from aseity to aseity.
50.
The
mind of the Spirit thinks perfectly from eternal to eternal.
51.The Father did not have a beginning.
52.
The Son
in His divine nature of aseity did not have a beginning.
53.
The
Spirit did not have a beginning.
54.
The
thrice mind of the Triune God did not have a beginning.
55.
The
mind of the Father is a mind of eternal aseity.
56.
The
mind of the Son is a mind of everlasting aseity.
57.
The
mind of the Spirit is a mind of never-ending aseity.
58.
The thrice
mind of aseity would never be an immaterial mind of evil (it is meant as an no-insult
intent to the Triune Aseity of the Triune Godhead).
59.
There
is no end to the thrice immaterial mind of the Triune Aseity in terms of
eternal wisdom, everlasting knowledge and the mind of aseity.
60.
The
knowledge of the mind of God the Father is eternal self-existent.
61.
The
knowledge of the mind of God the Son is everlasting aseity.
62.
The
knowledge of the mind of the God the Spirit is eternal everlasting aseity.
63.
The
immaterial mind of the Father is about transcendent greatness.
64.
The
immaterial mind of the Son is about imminent transcendent greatness.
65.
The
immaterial mind of the Spirit is about uplifting greatness.
66.
The
Father’s etymology is perfectly united to the Son’s etymology.
67.
The
Son’s etymology is perfectly united to the Father’s etymology.
68.
The
Father and the Son’s etymology is perfectly united to the Spirit’s etymology.
69.
The
Spirit’s etymology is perfectly united to the Father and the Son.
70.
The
Father’s immaterial mind never contradicts the immaterial mind of the Son.
71.
The
Son’s immaterial mind never contradicts the immaterial mind of the Father.
72.
The
Father and Son’s immaterial mind never contradicts the immaterial mind of the
Spirit.
73.
The
Spirit’s immaterial mind never contradicts the immaterial minds of the Father
and the Son.
74.
There
is no name for anyone but the Holy Father who is God the Father because He is
truly holy as the Father of lights.
75.
There
is no name that is great or better than the Incarnate One who has the Name
above every name (the sense of His eternal Incarnate Sinlessness).
76.
There
is no Counselor, Comforter or Helper that is better or greater than the Holy
Ghost as referring to (the Third Person of the Trinity).
77.The alleged “Holy Father” (the pope of
Romanism) is far from a perfect mind in the chair of Peter but the essence of
cosmic rebellion in eternal treason.
78.
The
immaterial mind of the Holy Father (not the pope but God the Father) is
self-existent eternal wisdom in perfect holiness.
79.
The
immaterial mind of the Holy Son (Jesus Christ) is not a conflict between His
human and divine natures but a complete harmony of the two natures.
80.
The
immaterial mind of the Holy Ghost (the Third Person) is He has a perfect divine
and perfect personality as the Dove and Hound of Heaven.
81.
The
Father’s mind is not against itself in the eternal, immutable and perfect way
of aseity, from everlasting to everlasting.
82.
The
Son’s mind is not against itself.
83.
The
mind of Jesus Christ is perfectly the One Hypostatic Christ.
84.
Incarnate
Deity (Jesus Christ) is two natures in one person: human and divine.
85.
The
Spirit of Christ (the Holy Spirit) is the Counselor, Comforter and Helper.
86.
The
thrice mind of the Trine God is superlatively holy in transcendent sinlessly.
87.
In the
fallen mind of a sinner, there are sinfully rebellious thoughts.
88.
The
problem of the immaterial mind of fallen man is not that it is not immaterial
but that it is sinful.
89.
The
immaterial mind of the Father of lights is holiness.
90.
The
immaterial mind of the Son of Love is holy goodness.
91.
The
immaterial mind of the Spirit of God is holy sanctification.
92.
The
Father hates the cosmic rebels of wickedness but deals with all in perfect
patience and temperance.
93.
The
Son’s Cross is intended for all of God’s people who the Spirit is pleased to
monergisticly quicken.
94.
The
Spirit takes the gift of the eternal Son’s Cross to put Him to an elect
sinner’s account.
95.
The
Father’s wrath is kindled, the Son’s wrath is kindled and the Spirit’s wrath is
kindled.
96.
The
Father’s is angry, the Son is angry and the Spirit is angry.
97.
The
Father loves justice, the Son loves justice and the Spirit loves justice.
98.
The
Father loves mercy, the Son loves mercy and the Spirit loves mercy.
99.
Let us
never forget that the peace of the Father is granted through the Son.
100.
The
Spirit never works apart from the Father and the Son because the Father and the
Son are always eternally righteous, holy, good and immutable.
CHAPTER
6 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
there something a holy God thinks that is not perfect?
1.
A holy
Triune God does not even try when He does whatsoever He pleases.
2.
Is a
holy God wrong to avenge? Never! Why?
By nature man is in original sin.
3.
Is a
holy God wrong to recompense just justice?
By no means! Man by nature is a
cosmic treasonist in the art and warfare of villainy in treacherous idolatry.
4.
Is a
holy God ever wrong to send sinner to hell?
God for bid!
5.
…It
simply means a holy Triune God cannot err to send whomsoever He is pleased to
make a trophy of justice in the eternal place of everlasting divine hatred of
God in a just justice.
6.
If a
holy Triune God’s nature as not bound to aseity He would not be perfect.
7.
A holy
Triune God is sinlessly holy in absolute perfection of goodness in a
non-creaturely sense because He holds the supreme power of all in His grasp.
8.
A
sinner could never will himself to aseity by status or nature.
9.
There
is no mystery for a creaturely sinner to exalt himself in truth to aseity.
10.
There
is no one who holds the absolute Power of Being who is a sinner.
11.
No one
who holds the absolute Power of Being (the Trinitarian Aseity) will ever be a
sinner.
12.
If the
Father did not think perfectly He would be a sinner.
13.
If the
Son did not think perfectly He would be a sinner.
14.
If the
Spirit did not think perfectly He would be a sinner.
15.Something without aseity holds the
supremest preeminent superiority.
16.
A
Triune Aseity holds forever in standing alone in its absolute plainness of the
scriptural foundationalism of the literalism of true truth of the greatest
greatness that was, is or will ever be in the sense of being.
17.
If
something is without aseity, it cannot be something that always was, is and
forever shall be.
18.
If the
Triune God did not have the nature of aseity, He would not be God.
19.
The
Triune God always was, is and forever shall be because of His nature.
20.
If the
Father, Son and Spirit did not know how He always existed, He would not be God…
21.
In
plain Reformed Baptist theology, He always existed in the sense of the plain
biblical literalism of the absolute Power of Being…
22.
The
Three Persons Alone have the Power of Being (a complete denial of
self-creation)….
23.
If the
Spirit thought He did not always exist in the ordinary language, He would not
be the divine Spirit of the Father as the Third Person.
24.
If the
Son thought He did not always exist in the plain language in terms of His
divine nature of aseity in the Hypostatic Christ, He would be a lair like
Jehovah’s Witnesses (but it could change if the Lord wills).
25.
If the
Father thought He did not always exist in the plain sense of the word, He would
not be the Father of lights.
26.
If the
Father thought He was created for a moment He would not be God the Father.
27.
If the
eternal Son thought He was created in His nature of divine aseity He would not
be God the Son.
28.
If the
self-existent Spirit thought He was created like Mormonism of Tritheistic
Polytheism (it could change), He would not be God the Spirit.
29.
It is
theologically according to objective biblicalism to properly speak of the
nature of deity grounded in aseity….
30.
The
Father as the one true God…
31.
The Son
as the one true God…
32.
And the
Spirit of God as the one true God….
33.
If the
Father thought one speck of a wrong thought He would not be the one true God.
34.
If the
eternal Son thought one dust particle of commission of sin He would not be the
one true God.
35.
If the
eternal Spirit thought one sand particle of omission of perfect righteousness
He would not be the one true God.
36.
The eternal
Father (the Father of lights) is a holy God as the First Person.
37.
The
eternal Son is Incarnate Deity (Jesus Christ) as the Second Person.
38.
The
eternal Spirit of Christ (the Hound of Heaven) as the Third Person.
39.
Neither
the Holy Father (God the Father) nor the Holy Spirit (the Spirit of God) will
never be the Second Person in terms of the eternal Son’s unified work.
40.
The
Spirit of Christ (the Third Person) in terms of the application will never be
the First Person (God the Father) nor the Second Person (Jesus Christ).
41.
Neither
the Second Person (Incarnate Deity) will be the First Person (God the Father)
and the Third Person (Holy Ghost).
42.
The
Trinitarian Economic Distinctions is (the One in essence but Three in Person).
43.
The
Triune Economic Distinctions is an eternal understanding of the Triune Godhead.
44.
The
Triune Nature of God is from everlasting to everlasting.
45.
The biblical
rationalism of scriptural foundationalism is the Nature of Monotheistic
Trinitarianism of aseity (eternal self-existent).
46.
If
there is aseity (everlasting to everlasting) in the thrice superlative aseity
of the Triune Kingship, it necessities the superlative holiness, goodness,
immutability and purity of the ever-living Father, ever-living Son and
ever-living Spirit.
47.
The
Father will never think wrongly of the Son and the Spirit.
48.
The Son
and the Spirit will never think wrongly of the Father.
49.
The
Father will never abolish the eternal Son.
50.
The
eternal Son will never abolish the Father.
51.The Father and the Son will never abolish
the Spirit.
52.
The
Father has good and pure thoughts of the Son and the Spirit.
53.
The Son
and the Spirit has good and pure thoughts of the Father.
54.
The
Father has holy thoughts of the Son and the Spirit.
55.
The Son
and the Spirit has holy thoughts of the Father.
56.
The
Father has perfect thoughts of the Son.
57.
The Son
has perfect thoughts of the Father.
58.
The
Father and the Son have perfect thoughts of the Spirit.
59.
The
Spirit has perfect thoughts of the Father and the Son.
60.
The
Father thinks of the Son.
61.
The Son
thinks of the Father.
62.
The
Father and the Son think of the Spirit.
63.
The
Spirit thinks of the Father and the Son.
64.
The
Father thinks in an everlasting transcendence in sinless holiness.
65.
The
eternal Son thinks in an everlasting transcendence in sinless holiness.
66.
The
eternal Spirit thinks in an everlasting transcendence in sinless holiness.
67.
The
Father is perfectly holy and good and pure.
68.
The
eternal Son is perfectly holy and good and pure.
69.
The
personality and deity of the Spirit is perfectly holy and good and pure.
70.
There
is nothing a holy Triune God thinks that is not eternally perfect.
71.
A holy
Triune God never does anything wrong.
72.
The
Father, Son and the Spirit are eternally sinless, perfect and immaculate.
73.
If the
Father was not eternally perfect He would not be the Father.
74.
If the
eternal Son was not immaculately everlasting He would not be the Son.
75.
If the
eternal Spirit was not sinlessly eternal He would not be the Spirit.
76.
The
self-existent Father thinks sinlessly concerning perfect transcendence.
77.The eternal Son thinks perfectly in His
co-equal nature of aseity with the Father.
78.
The
self-existent Spirit thinks immaculately in His co-equal nature of eternity.
79.
The
Triune Aseity is superlatively holy: namely, holy, holy, holy.
80.
A
superlative holy Triune God is thrice holy: namely, the Father, the Son and
Spirit.
81.
The
Father created out of nothing by His Word.
82.
The Son
created out of nothing by His Word.
83.
The
Spirit created out of nothing by His Word.
84.
The
Father thinks favorablely of all the elect.
85.
The Son
and Spirit thinks favorablely of all the elect.
86.
The
Father will never do something against the agreement of the Son.
87.
The Son
will never break His co-equal submissive to the Father.
88.
The
Father and the Son will never break Their agreement with the Spirit.
89.
The
Spirit will never break their agreement with the Father and the Son.
90.
Are the
Father’s thoughts agreeing with sin in the sense of making Him a sinner? Never, ever, ever!
91.
Did the
Son’s thoughts love sin on Him that He committed sin? By no means!
92.
The
eternal Son agonized when He knew sin would be applied to Him at the Cross in
the Garden…
93.
The
thoughts of the eternal Son agonized over the sin of Adam and Eve but spoke of
His unified work of divine redemption….
94.
The
thoughts of the eternal Spirit are always an absence of the approval of sin….
95.
The
Holy Spirit (the Dove of the Father and the Son) is not an impersonal force and
such a statement by those of non-Christian cults is a blasphemy of Holy
Scripture…
96.
Did the
Father, Son and Spirit lose power in the universe when Incarnate Deity (Jesus
Christ) died on the Cross? Never!
97.
At the
virginal conception of Jesus Christ (Incarnate Aseity) He was in full power of
the universe.
98.
The
Incarnate Son in a sense was blessed by the Father’s approbation of design
through the Spirit cosmic application with cosmic and heavenly coronation as
King of Kings…
99.
The
Father approved of the King Jesus by the Spirit seen in the Book of Isaiah and
the Revelation Apocalypse…
100.
The Son
of Aseity in His kindly and cosmic coronation would come after His bodily
ascension, but He was always on the throne and holding all cosmic fate (in a
biblical foundationalism of predestinarian truth not blind determinism) in His
little hands of love even in the world where He sustains and upholds all
things.
CHAPTER
7 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
How
did the Holy Father think of redemption in His design?
1.
The
design of God the Father is holy goodness.
2.
There
is no perfection of aseity save the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
3.
The
design of the Father is about whatsoever is right.
4.
The
glory of the Father is always about a righteous holiness.
5.
The
Father planned redemption in His cosmic plan of His ultimate salvation.
6.
The
Father’s design was about His victorious eternal Son by His Spirit.
7.
The
Father’s design cannot fail because God is God and His creation is not.
8.
The
Father’s design is not sinfully criminal in the true sense of the words.
9.
The
Father thought of redemption because He foredetermined all things.
10.
The
Father foredetermined all things in the etymology of the perpetuity of
redemption.
11. The Father controls all things because He
foredetermined all things.
12.
If the
Father did not foredetermine all things He did not control all things.
13.
The
Father thought of redemption in His salvational design because He is holy.
14.
The
Father is merciful because He designed salvation and redemption.
15.God
the Father is for redemptive grace and mercy.
16.
Everyone
thinks God the Father is against absolute mercy through His eternal Son.
17. The Father designed eternal mercy for all
the elect alone through Jesus Christ.
18.
The
Father is holy, good and graceful.
19.
The
Father is the First Person because He designed redemption and creation.
20.
The
Father is holy in immutable perfection.
21.
The
Father is good in unchangeable sinlessness.
22.
The
Father loves whatsoever is right, good and holy.
23.
The
Father does not love injustice of cruelty.
24.
Everyone
seems to think Jesus is love but not God the Father.
25.
No
insult intended to God the Father in Poin-12 but the Father is loving.
26.
The
Father is not a tyrannical designer like a criminal villain.
27.
No
insult is intended to the Great King Who is God the Father in Point-5.
28.
The
Father is of aseity so He would only eternally beget the eternal Son of aseity.
29.
The
Father did not design spiritual redemption through a non-aseity Son.
30.
God the
Father loves holiness, loves mercy, loves justice, loves goodness.
31.
I do
not understand why people may think the FATHER OF LIGHTS is not as loving as
Jesus Christ (the immutable and eternal Son).
32.
The
Father of Holiness is greater than all human creatures.
33.
The
Father of Goodness is greater than all in Trinitarian Economic Distinctions.
34.
The
Father is co-equal with the matchless Son.
35.
The Son
is co-equal but subordinate to the matchless Father.
36.
The
Father and the Son is co-equal to the Holy Ghost (the Holy Spirit).
37.
The
Holy Spirit is co-equal but subordinate to the Father and the Son.
38.
The
co-equal submissive subordinate way of the Son and the Spirit to the Father is
an Economic Distinction in the Trinitarian Godhead.
39.
The
divine nature of the eternal Son was not created but that of aseity.
40.
The
supernatural nature of the everlasting Spirit was not created but that of
aseity.
41.
If
someone supposes to argue that Son’s nature of aseity, and the Spirit’s nature
of aseity, is different than the Father’s nature of aseity, it is an error from
hell.
42.
The
Father designed the everlasting place of hell for cosmic villains out of the
good of the love of just justice in true truth.
43.
The
Father designed the eternal place of heaven for more than conquerors in Christ
the Victor that is a place of the love of Jesus Christ (Incarnate Deity).
44.
There
is One in Essence (or nature, unity, being) but Three in Person (the Father,
the Son and the Holy Spirit).
45.
The
Father is the glory of aseity.
46.
The Son
is the glory of aseity.
47.
The
Spirit is the glory of aseity.
48.
The
Father designed creation, redemption and salvation.
49.
The
Father is eternally opposed to the injustice of Satan.
50.
The
Father is eternally against the cruelty of this fallen world.
51.The
Father did not Author human sin but He is the Author of all that is good.
52.
The
Father did not Author human cruelty but He is the Author of all that is holy.
53.
The
Father created all things very good.
54.
God the
Father created Sunday (or the Sabbath Day, or Resurrection Day) holy.
55.
The
Father created without pre-existing material.
56.
By the
Father’s design the Son created without pre-existing material.
57.
From
the Father and the Son, the Spirit preceded from the Father and the Son.
58.
The
Spirit precedes from the First Person and the Second Person.
59.
The
Spirit by the Father’s design through the Son also created out of absolutely nothing
but without creation by pre-existing material.
60.
The
Father’s Hand created out of nothing but holds the Power of Being.
61.
The
Father always existed in the plain sense of the word.
62.
The
Father did not depend on anything outside of Himself to have the Power of
Being.
63.
By the
Father’s self-existent aseity He holds the right to all Power.
64.
There
is no earthly father that has the same divine love of like God the Father.
65.
The
FATHER OF LIGHTS in the plain sense of the words is the greatest.
66.
The
Father of Purity, God the Father, is above all.
67.
The
Father in whatsoever is right is about His matchless glory.
68.
If the
Father was not about His matchless glory He would be a liar.
69.
No
insult intended to the dignity, character and integrity of God the Father (Pt
68).
70.
The
Father must be worshipped in every adored honor.
71. God the Father must receive the worship of
camel’s knees (St. James the Apostle).
72.
The
eternal Son also must receive worship (like St. Peter’s “SAVE ME”).
73.
The
matchless Spirit also must receive worship (“Come Holy Spirit”).
74.
Should
we worship the Three in heresy?
Never! Only by distinctions of
the Three Persons in Monotheistic Trinitarianism (one nature revealed in three
subsistences)!
75.
A
Triune subsistence is the Three Persons, the Father, the Son and the Spirit.
76.
The
Father did not created the Son as an exalted angel (Jehovah’s Witnesses).
77.The
Father and the Son did not created the Spirit as an impersonal force (the
Watchtower Bible Tract Society).
78.
The
Father was not created by another being (Mormonism).
79.
The
Father was and is and forever shall be from everlasting to everlasting.
80.
The Son
was and is and forever shall be from everlasting to everlasting.
81.
The
Spirit was and is and forever shall be from everlasting to everlasting.
82.
The
Father loves His creation.
83.
The
Father loves mercy through His Son for the elect alone.
84.
The
Father loves justice through His for the never-converted reprobate.
85.
The
Father is ever as His sheer Being a just God and a mercy God.
86.
The
Father is everywhere (omnipresent).
87.
The
Father’s ever-presence is in hell and heaven.
88.
God the
Father’s presence in hell is about His furious justice.
89.
The
Holy Father’s presence in heaven is about His cosmic mercy.
90.
The
Father never had literal sexual relations with the Virgin Mary (Mormonism).
91.
No
insult intended to the Father (Pt 90) but a refutation of anti-Scriptural
heresy.
92.
The
Father did not design the Cross to atone for some sin of the elect (Mormonism).
93.
The
Father did not design blood atonement for human beings (Mormonism).
94.
The
Father did not design Lucifer and Christ as spiritual brothers (Mormonism).
95.
God the
Father leads, guides and directs His elect people to safely arrive at heaven.
96.
The
Father never forsook His Son in His highest obedience.
97.
The sin
that was applied to Jesus Christ where He became a mess of sin in that He took
out place.
98.
The
mess of sin is what Jesus became (though not a real sinner because He is
perfect now)
99.
But
Jesus Christ was forsaken at His Cross…but in what way? It was not His highest obedience that was
forsaken but the sin applied to Him in the sense that the Father did not have
approbation of sin but propitiated and expiated sin through His eternal Son who
was the Incarnate Ransom Victor (Jesus Christ)…
100.
The
Lamb of God was sacrificially offered in complete acceptance as a divine ransom
to the Father but not to Satan (Christus Victor that is Christ is Victorious)…
CHAPTER
8 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
What
does it mean for God the Father to do all according to His good pleasure?
1.
The
Father’s design was to send the Spirit of God through the eternal Son.
2.
If a
holy God damns is a holy God still holy?
Yes!
3.
What
makes a holy God that damns some of His human creation still holy? A holy God is a just God…
4.
If a
holy God was not a just God, He would be a sinner…
5.
If a
holy God was a sinner, He would not be truly God…
6.
If God
was a sinner and not truly holy but He damned as if He was sovereignly holy, He
would be a tyrant…
7.
If a
God who is a sinner damns in an arbitral manner in the sense of not seeming
good to Him in perfect holiness of aseity, He would be a God of sin….
8.
How? A holy God that damns is still holy because
of man’s cosmic treason of original sin…
9.
Is a
holy God still holy that saves unto a merciful election? Yes! but only through the propitiated,
expiated and efficacious Cross of the divine Lamb of God (Jesus Christ)….
10.
Without
the Cross of Jesus Christ for nine hours of Him enduring spiritual darkness and
a mess of eternal sin, the elect would never be saved.
11. The Cross was the Father’s good pleasure to
crush His Son.
12.
Did the
Father crush His eternal Son sinfully?
By no means at all!
13.
The
Father crushed His eternal Son in holy of aseity…
14.
The
Lord Jesus Christ in His eternal aseity in His divine nature has His own divine
prerogative to lay down His human life and to take up His human life….
15.It
was the Father’s good pleasure to have God the Son (the Second Person) take on
sinless human flesh because of the virginal conception where He was no
conceived through ordinary, human means but of the overshadowing of the Spirit
and Word…
16.
If it
seems best to God to save or destroy based on the purity of His holiness, what
else could be desired of Him and yet everyone seems to hate a blamelessly
innocent God who is superlatively holiness in transcendent aseity.
17. A holy God destines all before the womb by
His best sovereign choice.
18.
If a
holy God turns Esau over to sin to sell His birthright, He was in His good
pleasure to engage in humbly Esau in a civil way not redemptive.
19.
Esau
was not redemptively elect unto a forgiven godliness.
20.
It was
God’s good pleasure to use Esau’s sin for the glory of justice in and of
himself but not for the glory of His eternal Son’s Cross.
21.
Why? It seemed good or best to a holy God to use
Esau for the glory of justice.
22.
Good
pleasure does not mean wicked pleasure.
23.
Wicked
pleasure does not mean holy pleasure.
24.
Critics
of Full Augustinian or Complete Calvinism tend to think the one true Triune God
of the God-breathed Word of Truth is tyrannical about pleasure.
25.
Such a
blasphemy to God’s character, dignity and integrity to injury God’s perfect
majesty (though He is unassailable) because all a holy God does is good.
26.
The
Father does not have malice pleasure, the Son does not have malice pleasure and
the Spirit does not have malice pleasure.
27.
A holy
God does not have sinful pleasure in the death of the eternal reprobates.
28.
A holy
God does not rejoice that one of His human creations has fallen into sin.
29.
The
Father rejoices in song over one who has been converted to life by the Spirit.
30.
Does
not a holy God not take pleasure in the death of eternal reprobates mean He
does not have a pleasure of malice but a pleasure of holiness? Absolutely!
31.
How do
we know a holy God has a pleasure of holiness?
The God-breathed Bible says He is superlatively holy.
32.
What
else would a holy God of aseity have but transcendent holiness?
33.
It is
in a sense God’s good pleasure to be about the absolute good of justice.
34.
God’s
good pleasure is about the absolute good of mercy.
35.
If a
holy God is grounded in good pleasure, does the “is” mean a representation of
His good pleasure or truly a pleasure that is holy goodness of aseity?
36.
The
good pleasure of God is truly not a representation but true truth of God’s holy
good pleasure.
37.
Good
pleasure is not sinful pleasure by God the Father but perfect holiness.
38.
The
Father’s good pleasure does not mean wicked pleasure (no insult to Him intended
but to defend His innocence that “my duty
to discharge it” (Dr. Martin Luther).
39.
The
Three Persons is from aseity to aseity because their good pleasure is holiness.
40.
The
Father is rooted in good pleasure of aseity because He alone does what is right.
41.
The Son
and Spirit are based in aseity because He alone does whatsoever is holy.
42.
The
Father is victorious in His design of good pleasure.
43.
The
eternal Son is victorious in His unified work of good pleasure.
44.
The
self-existent Spirit is victorious in His work of application in good pleasure.
45.
Good
pleasure is about perfect holiness of aseity (from everlasting to everlasting).
46.
If God
the Father did whatsoever is right He would do His good pleasure.
47.
The
Father’s good pleasure is never about the commission of sinfulness, wrongdoing
and evil because He is transcendently perfect in immutable holiness.
48.
The
Father’s good pleasure is always about whatsoever is right.
49.
If the
Father did not do His good pleasure He would be a sinner (no insult intended to
the First Person of Majesty, God the Father).
50.
The
Father’s design could never be sinful…
51.The
reason why the Father’s design could never be sinful is because He is holy…
52.
The
Father is holy because it is His nature of aseity….
53.
If the
Father is based on aseity He is a superlatively holy God…
54.
If the
Father is a holy God He is of aseity…
55.
Aseity
presupposes a good, holy and immutable God the Father…
56.
The
Father in the absolute transcendent sense of holiness He is bound by aseity….
57.
The
Father is bound by aseity He does not depends upon something outside Himself…
58.
The
Father possesses within Himself the sense of the Power of Being…
59.
The
absolute Power of Being is what makes God God…
60.
If God
is God He holds the Power of Being….
61.
If the
Father holds the Power of Being He is absolutely perfect and sinless…
62.
If the
Father is perfect and sinless by nature of aseity, He is would sovereign…
63.
If the
Father is truly sovereign, He would be truly transcendently in perfect
holiness…
64.
How do
we know that a perfect God of holiness would be sovereign? The positive implication of aseity, the One
with the Power of Being, is that He is perfect and holy and good but also
sovereign…
65.
We know
He would be sovereign because He holds the Power of Being…
66.
If the
Father holds the Power of Being He is holy and sinless and good, etc…(in the
sense of Chapter 1 of The London Baptist Confession
of Faith of 1689)…
67.
It is
not a farce to make (Pt 64) but it is a farce to say the God who is God is
evil…
68.
There
was no evil Creator (no insult to the Father but defending His innocence as a
worthless name)…
69.
What if
a holy God was holy but not sovereign?
It could not be by the nature of aseity!
70.
If a
holy God is holy He must be sovereign…
71. What is a sovereign over? All creation and redemption and salvation…
72.
How do
you know the Holy Father (God the Father) is sovereign? The Father possess eternal aseity….
73.
The
Father holds the Power of Being where He spoke all into being…
74.
The
Father made everything where everything exists in a sense of dependence on Him…
75.
The
Father holds and sustains all things by the Power of His will…
76.
It is
true that the Father uses His good pleasure in everything….
77.The
Father uses His good pleasure in everything but He never tries when He does
things because He is by nature God…
78.
The
Father’s design is not somehow a non-design but a design of divine truth…
79.
How
does the Father not try when He does whatsoever is right because that is all He
is able to do according to His matchless glory?
The Father does not try and does whatsoever is right (never wrong)
because this is the nature of aseity…
80.
The
Father is “I AM WHO I AM” like the Son and Spirit…
81.
The Son
is One Person with two natures: human and divine….
82.
In the
sinless human nature of the eternal Son, He tries because He is truly human but
not touched by the fall of Adam in original sin, total depravity, radical
corruption, incomprehensible evil, total inability, and complete bankruptcy…
83.
The
Father gets things accomplished without our understanding of trying….
84.
The
Father’s omnipotent power of sovereign aseity is unspeakable, unbelievable and
unthinkable act of His awesome will….
85.
In the
Father’s awesome will it is not a contradiction to say He never tries and yet
all things are by His sheer spoken Word….
86.
The
Father’s awesome self-existent nature of non-trying divine affairs is a
defiance of human knowledge and wisdom…
87.
The
Father’s divine love is not that it is not real at all but that His great and
grand plan in determination of EVERYTHING GOOD is Jesus Christ (Incarnate
Deity)…
88.
The
Father speaks things into being or existence…because He does whatsoever is very
good and holy (Genesis Chapter 1)….
89.
The
Father never committed one speck or less or more of sin in all eternity past or
whatsoever is approaching or coming in eternity…
90.
The
Father never committed one iota of sin or omission of righteousness in all
human history of about a little over 6000 years…
91.
The
Father never sinned in the place of heaven when He created it and after He
created it….
92.
The Father
did not become the Father…
93.
The
Father always was God the Father (the Holy Father keeps through His own Name by
the self-authentication of Scripture by Incarnate Truth (Jesus Christ)…
94.
The
Father is not a God of Unitarianism (the heretical error that the Father alone
is God but the Son is not God Incarnate or the Spirit God)
95.
The Father
is God, the Son is God and the Holy Spirit is God (One in Essence but revealed
in Three Persons)…
96.
Is
there three gods? Never!
97.
If we
understand what we are saying, in the Trinitarian formula (One in unity Three
in Subsistences), there is the biblical rationalism of the positive
affirmation…
98.
The one
essence of God refers to Deuteronomy 6:4…
99.
The
Three Persons are the Three Subsistences and the Three Subsistences are the
Three Persons but (the Father, the Son and the Spirit) refer to Genesis 1:1 (Triune
Elohim) and Matthew 19:28
(the Three Persons referred to by Title)…
100.
If the
Father did not exercise His holy immutable good pleasure, He would be condemned
because a holy God does the absolute greatness superlative holiness in the
superiority of the highest height, deepest depth, divinest wideth, supernatural
length and forever depth of His own good pleasure but if someone does not
acknowledge the eternal Son of Man and everlasting Son of God (that sinner
cannot enter the kingdom of heaven though they have a blind zeal tossing them
to and fro with every wind of doctrine and yet deny the Father’s eternal Son
(Incarnate Deity who is Jesus Christ)…
CHAPTER
9 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Does
the Father perfectly will the Son?
1.
The
Father is not the God who designed spiritual salvation for all (the heresy of universalism
of Russian Orthodoxy).
2.
The
Father is not the God who is the architect of redemption for an “evangelical
universalism” as Dr. RC Sproul’s mentor states (the heresy of Arminianism).
3.
The
Father is not the God who saves because of traces of truth in false religion (the
heresy of Pope John Paul II’s modified universalism).
4.
The
Father never defied anyone in eternity (contrary to Mormonism) and (contrary to
the heresy of Greek Orthodoxy), but I do not mean they are the same doctrine;
rather, the concepts are the same but the extent of the nature of godhood is
different (Mormonism says that men can be gods and start redemption over again)
and (Greek Orthodoxy says that men will be defied). The basic problem with both false religions
is that no one can truly be god by nature or status who is a creature because
the Power of Being of Aseity cannot be won by a creaturely nature or a
creaturely status in the absolute sense but the only way to be God is to always
be (eternal self-existence) and the only Being who has this Power of Aseity is
the Triune Godhead of the Bible. How do we know this? The perpetuity of the objectivism of the 66
Books of the Bible.
5.
The
Father is not an exalted Man like Joseph Smith’s Mormonism.
6.
The
Father is a divine person who is not a male as a human being at all in anyway.
7.
God the
Father is called Father because it is an eternal way to understand the Supreme
Head in the Economic Trinity: namely, the Father as the First Person, the Son
as the Second Person, and the Spirit as Third Person.
8.
The
Father is not the Mother in a way to be called in feminist terms or a female
sense of biology but in the sense of the Father that loves in a mother who
reflects that divine love from above (the Heavenly & Holy Father (keep through Thine own Name).
9.
The
Father is not the human father of Jesus Christ that had sexual relations with
the Virgin Mary as an exalted Man (the falsehood of Mormonism).
10.
The
Father could not will the Son unless by superlative holy aseity.
11.
The Son
could not will the Father unless by superlative holy aseity.
12.
The
Father and Son could not will the Spirit unless by superlative holy aseity.
13.
The
Spirit could not will the Father and the Son unless by superlative holy aseity.
14.
If the
Father was not a divine person of aseity in Trinitarian terms, He would not be
the Father that perfectly wills the Son and the Father and Son will the Spirit.
15.If the Father alone is God in the Unitarian
sense, how is the Son Incarnate Deity?
16.
If the
Son is Incarnate Deity, how is the Father the only God in the Unitarian sense?
17.
If the
Spirit is a divine person of aseity, how is the Father alone God, again, in a
Unitarian sense?
18.
If the
Father is a god among mega billions, how does that prove that Jesus Christ is
His only eternal begotten Son?
19.
If the
Son is a god among mega billions, how does that prove He is Incarnate Deity
where His name is above every name in all time and eternity regarding His
creation?
20.
If the
Spirit is a god among mega billions, how does that prove He comes from the
Father and the Son?
21.
Tritheist
Polytheism (the heresy of Mormonism and a kind of Hinduism) denies the
Monotheistic Trinitarianism (One in essence but revealed in Three Persons).
22.
If the
Father is a created god how can He perfectly will the eternal Son?
23.
If the
eternal Son is a created god how can He perfectly will the eternal Father?
24.
If the
eternal Spirit is a created god how can He perfectly will the Father and the
Son?
25.
If the
Father wills the Son but the Son manifests a mode of the Father (not following
the Person of the Father in economic distinction), how could the Father’s
design be done through the Son if the Son is not Incarnate Deity without the
determination of the Father (as if He is a manifestation)?
26.
If the
eternal Son is not God Incarnate (as is the conclusion of the heresy of Modalism)
how can He be truly the Mediator between God and man if He is not God and man
in two natures in One Person?
27.
If the
eternal Spirit is not the Third Person how can He save by Modalistic Monergism (the
heresy of Jesus saves without His deity in the real sense because of modes that
make Him divine and yet do not exist as manifestations) but if the Spirit is a
mere mode of the Son how can He (the Holy Spirit) not a true Person that saves
in monergism where it takes the divine intervention of the Third Person?
28.
How can
modes of Jesus Christ save anyone in Modalistic Monergism (how can the Son save
from a manifestation of the Father by a mode of the Spirit)? In other words, how can a mode do anything
while the eternal Son is not deity of Incarnate Aseity (Jesus Christ)?
29.
The Son
is not a Modalistic Christ (the heresy of reducing Jesus to a mere sinless man)
because how could a Modalistic Christ be deity?
30.
The
Father is not a manifestation of the Son because what good is a manifestation?
31.
The
Holy Spirit is not a manifestation of the Son because how could it save?
32.
A holy
Triune God is Trinitarian in redemption, salvation and creation.
33.
There
is never anything in all existence (or being) that is not Trinitarian.
34.
The
Father in all is always through His Son by His Spirit.
35.
The
Father’s determination in the absolute sense never changes.
36.
The
eternal Son’s unified work of imputation for all the elect never changes.
37.
The
Holy Spirit’s application in monergism never changes for all of the elect.
38.
Immutability
of the Triune Godhead does not mean a holy God does not relent.
39.
The
Father is immutable in sinlessness.
40.
The
eternal Son is immutable in sinlessness.
41.
The
Holy Ghost is immutable in sinlessness.
42.
The
Father’s will is forever perfect.
43.
There
will never be a time when the will of the Triune Godhead is not perfect.
44.
The
Son’s will in co-equal submission to the Father is never not perfect.
45.
The
Father and the Son are co-equal with also in regards to the Holy Ghost.
46.
The
Father’s design never conflicted with the Son.
47.
The
eternal Son only agonized in the Garden because of sin applied to Him at the
Cross of Superlative Mercy of Incarnate Deity for all the elect.
48.
The
Father and the Son never are conflicted with the Spirit.
49.
The
Spirit never conflicted with the Father and the Son.
50.
If the
Spirit does not will the Son, how can the eternal Son be God Incarnate?
51.If the Father design does not will the
Spirit proceeding from the Father and the Son, how can it be the Father’s
design?
52.
The
Father never willed against the Son.
53.
The Son
never willed against the Father.
54.
The
Father and the Son never willed against the Spirit.
55.
The
Spirit never willed against the Father and the Son.
56.
The
Father never sinned against the Son.
57.
The Son
never sinned against the Father.
58.
The
Father and the Son never sinned against the Spirit.
59.
The
Spirit sinned against the Father and the Son.
60.
If the
Father did not will the Son He would not be God.
61.
If the
Son did not will the Father He would not be God.
62.
If the
Father and Son did not will the Spirit He would not be God.
63.
What
does it mean for the Father to perfectly the Son? Simply, the Father loves the Son as eternal
only-begotten God (non-created touching the deity of aseity of Jesus Christ).
64.
What
does it mean for the Son to perfectly will the Father? Simply, the Father is not begotten as the
everlasting Son nor preceding as the eternal Spirit.
65.
What
does it mean for the Father and the Son to will the Spirit? Simply, the Spirit wills the Father and the
Son who precedes from the Father and the Son.
66.
The
“willing” aspect of the Father, Son and Spirit is about divine love of aseity.
67.
The
Father was never created, the Son was never created and the Spirit was never
created.
68.
The
Father always is and was and forever shall be.
69.
The Son
always is and was and forever shall be.
70.
The
Spirit always is and was and forever shall be.
71.
The
Father is from everlasting to everlasting in that He wills the Son.
72.
The
Father and the Son is from eternal self-existence to will the Spirit.
73.
The
Spirit is from everlasting aseity to will the Father and the Son.
74.
The
Father is eternal in a non-creaturely sense of self-existence aseity.
75.
The Son
and the Spirit is eternal in a non-creaturely sense of self-existence aseity.
76.
The
Father is immutable, the Son is immutable and the Spirit is immutable.
77.If the Father was not holy He would not be
God.
78.
If the
Son was not holy He would not be God.
79.
If the
Spirit was not holy He would not be God.
80.
The
Triune Aseity is superlatively holy: namely, holy, holy, holy.
81.
The
Father possesses divine love of the eternal Son.
82.
The
eternal Son has divine love of the eternal Father.
83.
The
Father and the Son has divine love of the eternal Spirit.
84.
The
eternal Spirit has divine love of the eternal Father and Son.
85.
The
Father’s love of the Son is unbreakable.
86.
The
Son’s love of the Father is unthinkablely holy.
87.
The
Father and the Son’s loves the Spirit in unbelievably holiness.
88.
The
Spirit love’s the Father and the Son in indescribable good.
89.
Any God
the Father that is not aseity is not truly deity.
90.
Any God
the Son that is not aseity is not truly deity.
91.
Any God
the Spirit that is not aseity is not truly deity.
92.
The
Father is deity, the Son is deity and the Spirit is deity.
93.
There
is One nature of God revealed in Three Persons.
94.
The
Father could not perfectly will the Son unless the Father was God.
95.
The Son
could not perfectly will the Father unless the Son was God.
96.
The
Spirit could not perfectly will the Father and the Son unless the Father and
the Son were God.
97.
Yes,
the Father perfectly wills the eternal Son.
98.
The Son
perfectly wills the Father.
99.
The
Father and the Son perfectly wills the Spirit.
100.
The
Spirit perfectly wills the Father and the Son.
CHAPTER
10 ON 100-DISPUTATIONS:
Is
the Father a pantheist in all things or by His sheer thought sustain all
things?
1.
The
Father loves truth because He is Abba Truth (the Only Holy Father).
2.
The
Father loves truth because He is determined all truth because He is Truth.
3.
The Son
loves truth because He is Abba Christ (the Father Christ).
4.
The Son
is the Eternal Father in the sense of equal divinity with the Father (Pt 2).
5.
The
Spirit loves truth because He is Abba Holiness (the Father of Holiness).
6.
The
Spirit is the primary sanctifier in progressive sanctification (Pt 3).
7.
There
is a Trinitarian Truth (the one essence of truth revealed in three persons of
truth).
8.
The
Father is truth, the Son is truth and the Spirit is truth.
9.
The
Father is the First Person of Truth.
10.
The Son
is the Second Person of Truth.
11.
The
Spirit is the Third Person of Truth.
12.
The
Father of Truth loves of the Son of Truth.
13.
The Son
of Truth loves of the Father of Truth.
14.
The
Father and Son of Truth loves the Spirit of Truth.
15.The Spirit of Truth loves the Father and
Son of Truth.
16.
There
is no good or sound sacred science except of the written Word alone.
17.
The
Father hates so-called evolutionary science.
18.
The Son
hates so-called evolutionary science.
19.
The
Spirit hates so-called evolutionary science.
20.
The
Father hates pantheism, the Son hates pantheism and the Spirit hates pantheism.
21.
The
Father hates all heresy of creation.
22.
The Son
hates all heresy of creation.
23.
The
Spirit hates all heresy of creation.
24.
How do
we worship the Hypostatic Christ? By a
real theological distinction!
25.
We
worship the eternal deity of Jesus Christ by a legitimate distinction (not
Nestorianism) but between the humanity of Jesus and His deity.
26.
The
humanity of Jesus Christ must never be worshipped.
27.
If the
humanity of Jesus should not be worshipped, does it not show that pantheism is
a heretical evil and a theological falsehood?
28.
If
Jesus is the Everlasting Father, does the Bible confuse Jesus Christ in an
error with God the Father? By no means!
29.
If
Jesus is the Everlasting Father, what should we mean by it that reflects the
divine Word? Simply, Jesus and the
Father are one!
30.
What
does Jesus mean when He says “I and the Father are one?” It refers to the Father and the Son of the
same substance (co-equal of deity of aseity).
31.
How is
Jesus co-equal if He is Incarnate Aseity?
Jesus is inferior to the Father in regards to His humanity (though free
from original sin unlike all of human history until the end by the miraculous
virginal conception).
32.
…but
Jesus is co-equal to the Father in regards to His deity and the selfsame with
the Spirit of God.
33.
Is
Jesus Christ the Spirit of God? By no
means!
34.
Why do
I ask (Pt 9)? Some think the spiritual
omnipresence of Jesus Christ in His deity of aseity is confused with the deity
and personality of the Spirit of God in His omnipresence.
35.
Jesus
Christ is the Second Person of the Trinity.
36.
The
Spirit of God is the Third Person of the Trinity.
37.
The humanity
of Jesus Christ is sacred and sinless but not His deity (a distinction between
the two natures of the Prince of Peace).
38.
The
deity of Jesus Christ is sacred and sinless but not His humanity (a distinction
between the human and divine natures of the Incarnate Christ).
39.
It is
true that the humanity and deity of Jesus are sinless but we refer to the
sinlessness of Jesus Christ as His single Person (two natures of human and
divine).
40.
The
divine nature of Jesus not mean in the same sense of the Westminster divines.
41.
The
word “divine” in Hinduism is meant for a Eclectic Polytheism where the god of
death is the same kind of god as the deity of Jesus but this is a perpetuity of
heresy.
42.
The
divine nature is not the human nature and the human nature is not the divine
nature: namely, this is only with regard to Jesus Christ (Incarnate Everlasting
Father).
43.
Is
Father and the Son one? Yes! How?
One in purpose? Yes! But what
else? How much more but one in substance
(co-equal with the Father in His deity)!
44.
The
Father and the Son are in one substance (equally divine).
45.
No one
is equal to the Father but the Son and the Spirit in terms of deity.
46.
The Son
and the Spirit are equal to the Father in terms of deity.
47.
The
Father is greater than all because He is First in the Economic Distinctions.
48.
The Son
is greater than all humans because He is the God-man.
49.
The Son
is equal to the Father but He is Second in the Economic Distinctions.
50.
The
Spirit is greater than all so-called gods but He is Third in the Economic
Distinctions.
51.The Father, Son and the Holy Spirit are not
a Pantheistic Three-Headed deity.
52.
The
Triune Godhead operates with One plan: namely, the will of the Father.
53.
The Son
submits to the will of the Father but He is a subordinate co-equal.
54.
The
eternal Son is the Second Person of the Trinity.
55.
The
eternal Son of God is without deficiency of deity of aseity (He is understood
by the Second Person of the Trinity in an Economic sense).
56.
The
matchless Spirit of God is without denial to the Father’s design.
57.
God
cannot be a creature as a sense of deification of a creature.
58.
God
cannot mix godhood and creaturehood (a denial of the Hypostatic Christ).
59.
The
Hypostatic Christ (Incarnate Deity) is One Person (Jesus Christ) in two
natures: human and divine.
60.
God
cannot separate the two natures of the humanity and deity of the Lamb.
61.
God
cannot confuse His creation with His deity of aseity.
62.
No
created thing in itself is deity of aseity.
63.
The
creature and the Triune God are never equal in anyway of the plan words.
64.
Creation
is beautiful because of the beauty of the Father’s determination.
65.
The
universe is beautiful because of the beauty of Incarnate Architecture (Jesus
Christ Who is Incarnate Deity)
66.
All of
creation is beautiful because of the beauty of the Holy Spirit.
67.
The
Triune God rested on Sunday from all work.
68.
The
rest of the Triune Godhead is anthropomorphism (human expression).
69.
A holy
Trine God creates (not like man) but out of nothing.
70.
Sinners
create things with pre-existing materials but not out of nothing.
71.
The
Father created all things very good.
72.
The Son
created all things very good.
73.
The
Spirit created all things very good.
74.
The
Father designed all things in all creation.
75.
The Son
designed all existence in all living things.
76.
The
Spirit designed all living things in all creation.
77.The Father created, the Son created and the
Spirit created.
78.
The Son
is the everlasting only-begotten God-man of the Father.
79.
The
Spirit preceeds from the Father and the Son.
80.
The
divine thought of the Father sustains all living things.
81.
The
supernatural thought of the Son sustains all things living.
82.
The
miraculous thought of the Spirit upholds all things in existence.
83.
There
is no sense of the Pantheistic perspective (God is in everything created and
everything is divine in the same sense as a literal God) of Monotheistic Trinitarianism
(one unity of God revealed in three subsistences).
84.
There
is Monotheistic (the one essence of God) and Trinitarianism (the three
persons).
85.
A holy
Triune God sustains all things and upholds all things.
86.
If we
say the Reformed Orthodoxy of a holy Triune God sustains and upholds all
things, it is not a pantheistic teaching in the sense of all Reformed Baptist
Theology.
87.
There
are Roman Catholic Theologians (well-known) that believe in pantheism but it
has no basis in Polycarp, Clement of Rome
and Ignatius of Antioch
(early apologists and theologians in post-Bible and non-canonical terms).
88.
How
does a holy Triune God sustain and uphold all things? By the sheer Power of His Being because He is
the essence of true Being from everlasting to everlasting!
89.
The
Father sustains all things by the sheer Power of His Being.
90.
The
Father upholds all things by the sheer Power of His Word.
91.
The
Father speaks all into existence (or being) by His Divine Prerogative.
92.
The
Father creates all things by His Divine Command.
93.
St. Augustine called it His Divine Imperative.
94.
The
Father created by His own supernatural creativity in the beauty of His Being.
95.
Pantheism
is not beautiful at all because by nature no creature can be divine in the
absolute sense of the ordinary usage of plain language.
96.
The
Father in His superlative holiness is the essence of beauty.
97.
The
essence of beauty is not only the Father but the Son and the Spirit.
98.
The
three persons of the beauty of holiness is the Trinitarian Godhead.
99.
The
Father is by nature of aseity the most beautiful Being in all being.
100.
The Son
and the Spirit is by nature of aseity the most beautiful Being in all being.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.